Tuesday, March 31, 2009

16 Signs We Live Under Jewish Tyranny

16 Signs That You Live Under Tyranny

by Jon Roland

Tyranny is an important phenomenon that operates by principles by which it can be recognized in its early emerging stages, and, if the people are vigilant, prepared, and committed to liberty, countered before it becomes entrenched. The methods used to overthrow a constitutional order and establish a tyranny are well-known. However, despite this awareness, it is surprising how those who have no intention of perpetrating a tyranny can slip into these methods and bring about a tyranny despite their best intentions. Tyranny does not have to be deliberate. Tyrants can fool themselves as thoroughly as they fool everyone else. Here are the top 16 signs that you are living in a tyranny or heading that way.

1. Control of public information and opinion: It begins with withholding information, and leads to putting out false or misleading information. A government can develop ministries of propaganda under many guises. They typically call it "public information" or "marketing."

2. Vote fraud used to prevent the election of reformers: It doesn't matter which of the two major party candidates are elected if no real reformer can get nominated, and when news services start knowing the outcomes of elections before it is possible for them to know, then the votes are not being honestly counted.

3. Undue official influence on trials and juries: Non-random selection of jury panels, exclusion of those opposed to the law, exclusion of the jury from hearing argument on the law, exclusion of private prosecutors from access to the grand jury, and prevention of parties and their counsels from making effective arguments or challenging the government.

4. Usurpation of undelegated powers: This is usually done with popular support for solving some problem, or to redistribute wealth to the advantage of the supporters of the dominant faction, but it soon leads to the deprivation of rights of minorities and individuals.

5. Seeking a government monopoly on the capability and use of armed force: The first signs are efforts to register or restrict the possession and use of firearms, initially under the guise of "protecting" the public, which, when it actually results in increased crime, provides a basis for further disarmament efforts affecting more people and more weapons.

6. Militarization of law enforcement: Declaring a "war on crime" that becomes a war on civil liberties. Preparation of military forces for internal policing duties.

7. Infiltration and subversion of citizen groups that could be forces for reform: Internal spying and surveillance is the beginning. A sign is false prosecutions of their leaders.

8. Suppression of investigators and whistleblowers: When people who try to uncover high level wrongdoing are threatened, that is a sign the system is not only riddled with corruption, but that the corruption has passed the threshold into active tyranny.

9. Use of the law for competition suppression: It begins with the dominant faction winning support by paying off their supporters and suppressing their supporters' competitors, but leads to public officials themselves engaging in illegal activities and using the law to suppress independent competitors. A good example of this is narcotics trafficking.

10. Subversion of internal checks and balances: This involves the appointment to key positions of persons who can be controlled by their sponsors, and who are then induced to do illegal things. The worst way in which this occurs is in the appointment of judges that will go along with unconstitutional acts by the other branches.

11. Creation of a class of officials who are above the law: This is indicated by dismissal of charges for wrongdoing against persons who are "following orders."

12. Increasing dependency of the people on government: The classic approach to domination of the people is to first take everything they have away from them, then make them compliant with the demands of the rulers to get anything back again.

13. Increasing public ignorance of their civic duties and reluctance to perform them: When the people avoid doing things like voting and serving in militias and juries, tyranny is not far behind.

14. Use of staged events to produce popular support: Acts of terrorism, blamed on political opponents, followed immediately with well-prepared proposals for increased powers and budgets for suppressive agencies. Sometimes called a Reichstag plot.

15. Conversion of rights into privileges: Requiring licenses and permits for doing things that the government does not have the delegated power to restrict, except by due process in which the burden of proof is on the petitioner.

16. Political correctness: Many if not most people are susceptible to being recruited to engage in repressive actions against disfavored views or behaviors, and led to pave the way for the dominance of tyrannical government.

Blacks Are Showing the world What Animals They Are

Racism Cuts Both Ways

by Jonathon Davis, Mar 27, 2009

Racism is flourishing in the United States, but it's not the KKK, it's the hate
by blacks against whites.

The recent slaying of four Oakland police offers have brought racial tensions to
a boil. Not by the families and friends of the officers, but the black
community who support the young assassin.

Rallies have been held in Oakland to promote Lovelle Mixon as a hero to the
black community. Many see him as standing up against the "white slave masters".
Their words, not mine.

The main stream media (MSM) has portrayed the election of the first black
president as stirring racist sentiment in the white community. As it appears,
it's the other way around. Many cable channels have taken it upon themselves to
show documentaries over supposed "hate groups" and white supremacy ideology.

This is a growing trend within our society. Racism not from whites, but blacks.
When one discusses racism, they always mention slavery and the KKK, but they
never mention the other side of racism. Racism cuts both ways, and that's the
story they don't tell you.

This recent support for a cop killer because he was black is just one of many
things that have enveloped our country, and not a word from the MSM.

Only last month it was the Detroit city council informing it's citizens that
whites weren't allowed to even say Obama's name. Even supporters outside were
informing the white citizens that they should go home, the city council wasn't a
place for them.

The rallies in Oakland also mirror the slayings in St. Louis where a black
shooter killed five individuals and wounded two last year. Afterwards, many
blacks within the community openly praised the murders.

The Jena 6 trials made national news when black men and women from around the
country piled into Jena, Louisiana to protest the trials of six black men who
nearly beat a fellow student to death. The community felt that the men were
justified in their actions, and should of been pardoned of their crimes.

Even the brutal rape and eventual killings of Channon Christian and Christopher
Newsom were blacked out by the MSM. The internet was virtually the only place
you heard of it. And then, you found site after site portraying the killings as
a positive step for the black community.

This is the same black community that cheered when O.J. Simpson was found not
guilty for murdering his wife. The death of whites by the hands of a black man
is accepted in the black community, and thought of as street credit.

We're constantly being bombarded with the idea of tolerance and diversity. Yet,
not all hear the message because their hearts are filled with nothing but hate
and contempt for white individuals. The election of Barack Obama was supposed
to put an end to racial tensions, but it's only inspired hatred and vengeance in
the black community.


Sunday, March 29, 2009

We're All Terrorists Now by E.J. Steele

March 25, 2009

"The history of liberty is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it."
--- Woodrow Wilson (Speech in New York, September 9, 1912)

""Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."
--- H. L. Mencken (1880-1956)

Audio files of We're All Terrorists Now:
Formal Rant Only - (10 mb, 12 min) mp3 streaming mp3
Entire Broadcast - (13 mb, 58 min) mp3 streaming mp3

3-18-09 - Second Annual State of the Revolution mp3 audio
3-11-09 - The Road to Hell is Paved with Bailout Money mp3 audio
1/01/09 -
Top-Ten List for Boys Crying Wolf mp3 audio
12/24/08 -
The Late-Night Visitor
12/13/08 - Billions for Bankers mp3 audio
11/12/08 - Dear Mr. Obama mp3 audio

My name is Edgar J. Steele.

We've come through the Looking Glass. On this side, however, is Wonderland with a decidedly Orwellian twist.

The Red Queen has morphed into a Marxist President (still red and still in charge, though).

The Mad Hatter is Little Timmy Geithner, wannabe Treasury Czar of the World, whose Tea Party is hosted on Wall Street while other "tea parties" are convened by patriots throughout America in response.

The maddening Cheshire Cat is our media, with that smile conveying nothing but misdirection and gibberish.

"Some are more equal than others," said Orwell through his piggy little Animal Farm overseer. We know who are the "others." Thee and me, of course. For extra points, guess who are the "some" of whom Orwell wrote.

Painting the Roses Red

"We're painting the roses red," sang the playing-card soldiers when asked by Alice why they were drenching all the white roses in the kingdom with bright red paint. All the minions of the new Administration are busy repainting roses throughout America.

However, as observed by Shakespeare, "What is in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Bush's policies still are the same, regardless of the spin now being accorded them by the Obamatrons. We're still in Iraq. Gitmo still is in business. America's southern border still is wide open. The Bush bailouts continue unabated, but now are on steroids.

It's enough to make your head spin, isn't it?

Each week brings a fresh batch of outrageous events and news items that further marginalize an ever-growing percentage of Americans. Last week brought a bumper crop, headed by an incredible document leaked by someone in the Missouri police bureaucracy. Entitled "The Modern Militia Movement," the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) document popped up on Alex Jones' web site and promptly sent shock waves throughout the patriot community.

You're a Terrorist Now

Have you ever supported in any way Republican Ron Paul of Texas? How about last year's Libertarian Party Presidential candidate, Bob Barr? Or the Constitution Party's Presidential candidate, Chuck Baldwin? According to MIAC, you are a "militia-influenced terrorist." Yep, you heard me right. You are a terrorist. Look, I couldn't just make up stuff as outlandish as is this sort of thing. Truth continues to be stranger than fiction. We're painting the roses red.

Better go scrape that bumper sticker off your car, because MIAC specifically identifies it as evidence that you should be watched and approached with caution. MIAC is just one of 58 "fusion centers" funded throughout America by the federal Department of Homeland Security with over a quarter-billion dollars, tasked with identifying "potential trends or patterns of terrorist or criminal operations" (per the MIAC web site) in America.

Are you opposed to the coming North American Union (NAU), whereby America is subsumed within a new government encompassing all of North America? How about the New World Order (NWO), whereby America surrenders her Constitution altogether in favor of becoming just another cog in a world government? Speak out against either the NAU or the NWO in any way and you are a terrorist, says MIAC, courtesy of your tax dollars spent in its support.

Of course, the MIAC report is nothing new. During the Clinton administration, the FBI issued a document identifying "defenders of the US Constitution" as "Right-Wing Extremists" to be watched as being potential terrorists.

Are you opposed to illegal immigration? According to MIAC, you are a terrorist. Libertarians and Constitutionalists are "racists," which might cause some consternation at the headquarters of my own state's (Idaho) Constitution Party, since its chairman is a Black man (Paul Venable, whom I intend to ask how he feels about MIAC's outlandish characterization). Those who follow my writing and ranting know full well that I am a big supporter of the Constitution Party.

Are you opposed to abortion? Terrorist.

Do you fly an American flag? Terrorist.

Opposed to gun confiscation? Terrorist.

Opposed to the expansion of federal power at the expense of State jurisdiction? Terrorist.

Are you concerned that Obama might put through a mandatory Universal Service Program (which has just been announced, incidentally)? Terrorist.

Do you oppose the convening of a Constitutional Convention (now demanded by 32 of the 34 states necessary to force its convening) because you fear the further eroding or, even, eradication of the First and/or Second Amendments? Terrorist.

Offered the chance to denounce MIAC or, at least, explain it away, Missouri's governor, Jay Nixon, unequivocally supported and defended it, stating, “Any way they take that information and can analyze what the threat levels are is important to make sure the public stays safe."

It's for the children, in other words.

So, now we have descended all the way into George Orwell's 1984. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

Be anything but a full-on supporter of the Democrat agenda and you are a terrorist. Even Republicans now are suspect, witness Ron Paul's status in Missouri, courtesy of federal tax-dollar support. I sure was glad to see George W. Bush go, but the hair on the back of my neck now is beginning to stand up. So should yours.

I'm a Terrorist Now

It no longer matters, so I might as well 'fess up: I fly an American flag in my front yard. I believe in the Constitution. I have voted straight Constitution Party since it dropped its "Taxpayer Party" name. I am strongly opposed to gun legislation of every stripe. I oppose illegal immigration and want all of them thrown back into Mexico, anchor babies and all. I strongly oppose the NAU, NWO, NAFTA, WTO and GATT.

I believe in the US Constitution and have repeatedly taken oaths (military and bar admission) to defend it from enemies, both foreign and domestic.

In Missouri I am a terrorist. According to the feds, until they denounce MIAC and cut off its funding, I am a terrorist. If you are reading or listening to these words, almost certainly you are a terrorist, too.

They make it harder and harder every day to keep from thinking in terms of the government as our enemy, don't they?

You want to see real terrorists? How about those who willingly plunder the future of our children and their children for their own financial gain? What about a government that invades small countries on a lie and kills millions of their citizens? What about a government that tortures even its own citizens? What about a government that takes your retirement funds and gives them to illegal aliens? What about a government that encourages your employer to send your job overseas? These are the very definitions of terrorism, folks. I call the perpetrators of all these things terrorists. Terrorists who cause many of us now to lie awake nights, sweating how we are going to take care of our families or make do in our old age.

We're All Terrorists Now

And they have the unmitigated gall to call us terrorists. Well, I guess that we all are terrorists now.

Some say that patriotism is old fashioned. Some think that love of country is out of date. Some consider the slightest show of sentiment toward one's flag to be naive.

But, God help us – and God help our country – if the cynics, the one worlders, the Zionist Neoconservative intellectual dilettantes, ever persuade us that these things have passed us by.

Because, ladies and gentlemen, patriotism, loyalty, sentiment...THESE THINGS ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

In my lifetime, I have seen America grow and change. I have seen her stand tall and I have seen her brought low.

I have seen the best that America can be and, recently, I have seen the worst that America can be.

But, always, she has been my America ... our America ... and she will be our America, come what may ... for better or for worse.

We have a habit here in America of forgetting what a grand and noble experiment she represented when our founding fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence and, then, the Constitution. We forget the sacrifices they made ... in property ... in family ... and, finally, in their own blood.

We forget the sacrifices by all those since that time. Sacrifices made so that we might have the freedom to come together like this and discuss change.

Well, I submit that the time has come for change. Real change. Real change that we can believe in, not the phony campaign promises made by Barack Obama.

New America. An idea whose time has come.

My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my web site, www.NickelRant.com, for other messages just like this one.


Copyright 2009, Edgar J. Steele

Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article
and its related audio file among private individuals and groups,
post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit
Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

On-Line link to this rant in HTML format: http://www.nickelrant.com/rants/090325rant.htm

Brown vs. Board, Govt. vs. People: The Curious Course Of The Desegregation Wars

By F. Roger Devlin

If you’re like me, you learned that segregation was an unmitigated evil before you were old enough to pronounce the word correctly. A whole generation of us got our first lesson in Constitutional jurisprudence from the early 1970s rock group Three Dog Night

The ink is black
The page is white
Together we learn to read and write
The child is black
The child is white
The whole world looks upon the sight
The beautiful sight

And now a child can understand
That this is the law of all the land

All the land…

Even sober legal scholars lapse into religious language when dealing with Brown vs. the Board of Education. The justices of the Supreme Court,” according to Law Professor Michael J. Perry [Email him]as cited by historian Raymond Wolters in his new book Race and Education 1954-2007,were modern ‘prophets’ selected by an ‘American Israel’ and authorized to strike down laws they deemed mistaken.” [The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights, 1982]

Others quoted by Wolters liken desegregation’s crusaders to Joshua—making walls tumble down and leading people into the Promised Land of American public schools. So sacrosanct has the landmark 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision become that no judge can be confirmed for a federal appointment today without paying it lip service.

Even Wolters reassures the average reader with a few conventional phrases: Brown “condemned an entrenched injustice [and] reconciled the nation’s official policies with its basic principles”. ()But he demonstrates conclusively that the legal reasoning behind the decision was spurious and many of its later outgrowths problematic or negative.

Before deciding the Brown case, the Supreme Court asked the NAACP’s lawyers for evidence that the framers of the 14th Amendment had contemplated school desegregation. The Court, it seems, wanted to rule against segregation but feared being accused of the sort of judicial activism which several of the justices had denounced during the years of the New Deal.

The NAACP commissioned historian Alfred H. Kelly, who quickly discovered that the very Congress which submitted the 14th Amendment to the States had itself established segregated schools in the District of Columbia! Kelly later described how he had

“manipulated history…carefully marshalling every scrap of evidence in favor of the desired interpretation and just as carefully doctoring all the evidence to the contrary, either by suppressing it when that seemed plausible, or by distorting it when suppression was not possible.” [Clio and the Court: An Illicit Love Affair, by Alfred H. Kelly, Supreme Court Review, 119 (1965)]

Afraid bad history would be insufficient, the NAACP mixed in some bad social science. Black psychologist Kenneth B. Clark reported that nine out of sixteen Black children from segregated schools in South Carolina preferred to play with a white rather than a black doll. Clark did not mention that his study of desegregated black children found the same phenomenon. But citing this crude experiment as “modern authority,” the Supreme Court decided that the segregation of Black pupils imposed upon them “a feeling of inferiority… that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.”

In actual fact, segregation had served to spare blacks invidious comparisons with whites. Later studies, reported by Wolters, confirmed that black children in segregated schools had higher self-esteem than those in majority-white schools.

By its appeal to sociology, Brown set a precedent for deciding cases on extralegal grounds. Segregationists, who had at first based their case on eighty years of legal precedent, soon responded with scientific evidence of their own. (Wolters reports that a reviewer for his publisher, the University of Missouri Press, was so disturbed by the objective tone in which Prof. Wolters recounted these segregationist arguments that he recommended not publishing the book unless the author disavowed them!)

In Stell v. Savannah (1963), segregationists produced expert witnesses to testify that

“the differences between the two racial groups in a variety of mental tests are so large, so regular and so persistent under all sorts of conditions that it is almost unthinkable to conclude that they are entirely a matter of environment.” [Henry E. Garrett, "Negro- White Differences in Mental Ability in the United States," Scientific Monthly 65, 9 October, 1947]

Wesley Critz George, a distinguished professor of anatomy explained to the court that

the average weight of the brains of Caucasians was about 1,380 grams, that of Negroes about 1,240 grams, with the difference especially pronounced in the prefrontal area where abstract thought occurred.[Wolters, p. 36]

This evidence was powerful enough, Wolters reports, to cause NAACP attorney Constance Motley “to weep audibly in the courtroom.” [Race and Reality, by Carleton Putnam, Chapter IV]

Despite having won Brown on the basis of extralegal evidence, the NAACP now did an about-face and tried (unsuccessfully) to get scientific testimony excluded from the case as irrelevant. The presiding judge in Stell v. Savannah ruled in favor of the segregationists. (His ruling was overturned on appeal.)

The quest for integration now entered its second phase. For more than a decade after Brown, “desegregation” was not understood to require integration. Well-established residential patterns meant that many schools would continue to be virtually all-white or all-black even without practicing racial discrimination. Desegregation meant merely that a child could not be excluded from the local public school on the grounds of race. But it did not mandate racial mixture in schools.

This distinction between desegregation and integration was made explicitly and repeatedly by the courts, and was written into the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Prof. Wolters considers it both clear and valid. But most legal scholars now disagree; they reject or ignore the distinction and (at least nominally) interpret Brown to require racial mixing. How did this change come about?

After ten years of resistance, the South grudgingly accepted Brown in the wake of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which tied federal funding to desegregation. Most districts adopted a freedom of choice policy, allowing students to attend any school they wished. Typically, this resulted in a few Negro children transferring to previously all-White schools; transfers in the opposite direction were almost unheard of.

However, a significant faction within the Civil Rights movement (and increasingly within the government bureaucracy) was unsatisfied with these modest changes. It would settle for nothing less than full integration. Some were inspired by Equality of Educational Opportunity, a seven-hundred page study produced under the direction of sociologist James S. Coleman and commonly called the “Coleman report.” This document, issued in 1966, was interpreted to imply (among other things) that when blacks attended majority white schools, their academic performance improved without the performance of whites declining.

That same year, the federal Office of Education issued a new set of guidelines for enforcing desegregation. The guidelines stated:

“The single most substantial indication as to whether a free-choice plan is actually working is the extent to which Negro or other minority group students have in fact transferred from segregated schools.” [United States Commission on Civil Rights, Federal Rights Under School Desegregation Law, June 1966,PDF]

The document went on to specify that a school would not be considered desegregated unless the amount of racial mixing doubled each year until racial balance was achieved! One southern Senator, Richard B. Russell, described the new guidelines as “fanaticism at its very zenith”. Wolters argues that the Office of Education knew perfectly well that it was changing the meaning of the law.

Court challenges quickly followed, with the Fourth Circuit rejecting the guidelines and the Fifth Circuit upholding them. Then, in the case of Green v. New Kent County (1968), the Supreme Court unanimously sided with the Fifth Circuit and ordered southern school districts to assign students by race in order to achieve substantial integration. The court had overturned Brown while claiming to uphold it.

It was in response to the Green decision that a judge in Charlotte, North Carolina imposed a busing program to disperse the races until no school was recognizably black or white. The Supreme Court reviewed the case and upheld the ruling in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg (1971). The justices specifically endorsed means such as busing and the gerrymandering of school districts to bring about integration. But they also cautioned that such integration was mandated only in order to remedy past segregation, rather than as an end in itself. As a result, the ruling applied mainly to the South.

Nevertheless, within two years the Supreme Court was requiring integration in Denver in order to “remedy” de facto segregation determined by residential patterns (Keyes v. School District No. 1).

In Detroit plans were soon afoot to combine the black city districts with fifty-three white suburban districts. The new consolidated school district was so large that some children would have been bused three hours each day.

At this point, finally, the Supreme Court flinched before the monster it had wrought—and possibly “followed the election returns”, in the shape of the George Wallace phenomenon and the Nixon presidency. In Milliken v. Bradley (1974), a 5-4 majority voted to reverse and censure the lower courts for having mandated the Detroit integration program.

As Prof. Wolters summarizes:

Brown had been the watershed of school desegregation. Green, Swann and Keyes represented the high tide for integration. Milliken marked the water’s edge.”

Integration was a failure. It did nothing to improve the performance of black schoolchildren (as even James S. Coleman came to concede in a 1978 paper noted by Wolters). It wasted untold money and time. It sparked massive white flight. And it created deep resentment among both blacks and whites. Blacks perceived white academic achievement as a form of “showing off” intended to make them feel inferior. The minority of blacks who did keep up with whites got accused of being “sellouts.” Whites were put off by black rowdiness, profanity and—sometimes—misconduct toward white girls. Prof. Wolters documents the entire fiasco with a wealth of detail I can only hint at here.

In integration’s third phase, which still continues, the Supreme Court in a series of rulings issued between 1991 and 2007 has moved gradually back toward the original understanding of Brown. But by this time, there were fewer whites left in many public school districts for blacks to integrate with anyway—and those remaining were disproportionately poorer and disadvantaged.

Prof. Wolters shares a common tendency to identify education with public education. Private schools receive passing mention in his narrative only to explain the otherwise mysterious disappearance of wealthier white students following Brown.

Yet judicial meddling in education was only made possible by that great egalitarian reform of a previous era, public schooling. Race in education became a political issue because education itself had long since been politicized by governmental takeover. This might be a matter worth Prof. Wolters’ attention in writing his promised next book on the subject of educational reform.

F. Roger Devlin [Email him] is a contributing editor for The Occidental Quarterly and the author of Alexandre Kojeve and the Outcome of Modern Thought.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Bird Flu In Our Vaccines.

F. William Engdahl
Global Research
August 15, 2008
There is alarming evidence accumulated
by serious scientific sources that the US Government
is about to or already has ‘weaponized’ Avian Flu.
If the reports are accurate, this could unleash a new pandemic
on the planet that could be more devastating than the
1918 Spanish Flu epidemic which killed an estimated
30 million people worldwide before it eventually died out.
Pentagon and NIH experiments with remains in frozen state
of the 1918 virus are the height of scientific folly.
Is the United States about to unleash a new racially selective
pandemic through the process of mandatory vaccination
with an alleged vaccine "against" Avian Flu?
There is reason to believe that sections of the international
pharmaceutical industry cartel are acting in concert with
the US Government to develop a genetically modified H5N1 virus
substance that could unleash a man-made pandemic, perhaps more deadly
than the 1918 ‘Spanish Influenza’ pandemic claiming up to 30 million lives.(1)
Rima E. Laibow, MD, head of the Natural Solutions Foundation,
a citizen watchdog group monitoring the pharmaceutical industry states,
"Our best intelligence estimate is that pandemic Avian Flu has already
been created through genetic engineering in the United States,
fusing the deadly genome of the 1918 Pandemic,
misnamed the ‘Spanish Flu’, with the DNA of the innocuous
H5N1 virus in a growth medium of human kidney cells, according to
the National Institutes of Health and the vaccine’s manufacturer.
Some virologists believe that this would insure that the man-made
mutant virus recognizes human cells and knows how to invade them." (2)
If true, as Laibow points out,
"A basic virological fact that the public has not been told is that
it is impossible to make a vaccine against a virus that does not yet exist.
Public relations efforts to the contrary, IF a vaccine is being made
against the Avian Flu virus in its pandemic form, that means that
the pandemic virus must already exist, period, end of discussion."(3)
The genome of the 1918 pandemic, the so-called "Spanish Flu",
was recently intentionally resurrected by the United States government
from a frozen corpse that died of the flu in 1918 in Alaska.
Because of that resurrection, both the Avian Flu,
and its "vaccine" are now a significant threat to public health.
The Spanish Flu, which was not Spanish at all,
was created in the US through an early bioweapons program
and injected into healthy young men (i.e., ’soldiers’)
as the first mandatory vaccination in the military during World War I.
The "Spanish Flu", which originated in Kansas on US Military bases,
was one of the deadliest pandemics in modern history. It was also
one of the most successful biological weapons ever created,
until now.Aspartame and Tyson Foods doubts
To date, there have only been around 385 human cases of Avian Flu
identified worldwide (assuming those identifications are trustworthy,of course),
with 243 deaths. To put the absurdity of this effort into perspective,
Laibow points out, Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), which researchers
believe is heavily associated with aspartame consumption,
is a leading cause of death which, according to the CDC, for example,
killed 460,000 Americans in 1999 and the numbers keep rising (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5106a3.htm.)
But, aspartame is not under criticism. Interesting as a footnote
on Aspartame, G.D. Searle, the Chicago drugs company that held
the patent on Aspartame was in danger of losing its license
from the US Government Food & Drug Administration in the 1980’s
until Donald Rumsfeld, out of Government, was named President of Searle.
Rumsfeld used his contacts in Washington to get the FDA to approve
Aspartame despite known tests showing serious health effects on rats.
As I document in detail in my book,
Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, the same
Don Rumsfeld went on to become chairman and principal stockholder
of a California pharmaceutical company, Gilead Sciences Inc.,
which developed and patented Tamiflu in 1996,
first as a drug for AIDS, later as a vaccine for H5N1 Avian Flu.
In 1997 Donald H. Rumsfeld was named Chairman of the
Board of Gilead Sciences, where he remained until early 2001
when he became Defense Secretary.
As Secretary he refused to sell his stock at the time he came under
conflict of interest allegations when he ordered $1 billion worth of Tamiflu
be bought to injected into the US military personnel as a "precaution."
It was later proven that Tamiflu was in no antidote for H5N1
and its side effects were sometimes very severe.
Laibow adds, "Given the shockingly obvious lack of any threat
from an un-weaponized H5N1 virus, how can we explain
the Bush Administration spending billions of dollars preparing
each of the 50 States, for what it calls the ‘inevitable Bird Flu pandemic,’
which they say could kill half or more of all Americans
and similar numbers of people around the globe?"(4)
Ominously, on June 3, Associated Press reported,
"Tyson Foods Inc. has begun killing and burying the carcasses
of 15,000 hens from a flock that tested positive for exposure to a strain
of the bird flu in northwest Arkansas, state officials said Tuesday."
Tyson Foods is the largest industrialized producer of chickens
in the world and has been repeatedly under attack
for its unsanitary conditions of breeding and slaughtering.
In January 2005, a US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
report to the US Senate, "Safety in the Meat and Poultry Industry,"
concluded that US meat and poultry processing plants had
"one of the highest rates of injury and illness of any industry."
They cited exposure to
"dangerous chemicals, blood, faecal matter, exacerbated
by poor ventilation and often extreme temperatures. Workers
typically faced hazardous conditions, loud noise, must work
in narrow confines with sharp tools and dangerous machinery."
The industrialization of chicken-raising and slaughtering in the USA
has progressed to the point that by 2003 when the first cases
of H5N1 Avian Flu virus were reported from Asia,
five giant multinational agribusiness companies dominated
the production and processing of chicken meat in the United States.
The five companies were Tyson Foods, the largest in the world;
Gold Kist Inc; Pilgrim’s Pride; ConAgra Poultry; and Perdue Farms.(5)
Most outbreaks of Avian Flu in Asia have been traced back
to such mass chicken industrial factory centers.(6)
In May this year, The Canadian Press reported from Toronto,
"An experiment mating H5N1 avian flu viruses and a strain of human flu
in a laboratory produced a surprising number of hybrid viruses
that were biologically fit, a new study reveals. And while none
of the offspring viruses was as virulent as the original H5N1,
about one in five were lethal to mice at low doses, showing they retained
at least a portion of the power of their dangerous parent." (7)
The Toronto article went on,
"The work suggests that under the right circumstances
- and no one is clear what all of those are - the two types of flu viruses
could swap genes in a way that might allow the H5N1 virus
to acquire the capacity to trigger a pandemic.
That process is called reassortment.
‘This study is just showing exactly that:
There is a risk this virus can successfully reassort with a human virus,’
said Richard Webby, director of the World Health Organization’s
collaborating centre for influenza research
at St. Jude Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee." (8)
Pentagon Bioweapon research
Prof. Mathew Meselson, a professor of molecular biology at Harvard,
and well-respected scientist in the area of chemical and biological warfare,
confirms that the United States government has extensively
researched and developed biological weapons in the past.
Meselson described an American facility, north of Terre Haute, Indiana,
built in 1944 that would have produced 500,000
4 pound anthrax bombs monthly once in full operation.
Meselson was part of a team that proved the accidental release
of anthrax at a Soviet facility in 1979, disproved charges
of biological warfare in Laos and Cambodia in the late 1970s,
and was a driving force behind popularizing
the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1994.
Since coming in office, the Bush-Cheney Administration
has done much to weaken that Chemical Weapons Convention
as well as ones on biological weapons. One of George W. Bush’s
first acts as President in early 2001 was to oppose a proposed
international Biological and Toxic Weapons Protocol,
without explanation, leading to the death of the talks.
In a 2004 study, the British Medical Association warned that the world
was perhaps only a few years away from "terrifying biological weapons
capable of killing only people of specific ethnic groups,"
citing advances in genetic weapons technology. (9)
The US Department of Homeland Security has ominously enough announced
it is ordering production and stockpiling of a pandemic influenza vaccine:
"The U.S. Government is taking steps to minimize the need
to make vaccine allocation decisions by supporting efforts
to increase domestic influenza vaccine production capacity.
Significant funding is being provided to develop new vaccine technologies
that allow production of enough pandemic influenza vaccine
for any person in the United States who wants to be vaccinated
within six months of a pandemic declaration." (10)
The curious role of Sanofi Pasteur
The US Government has been financing the development of a vaccine against
H5N1 on a "fast track" basis since 2004. Sanofi Pasteur in Swiftwater,
Pennsylvania, a subsidiary of the giant French pharmaceutical firm,
the third largest in the world, manufactured an inactivated vaccine
made from an H5N1 virus isolated in Southeast Asia in 2004.
Sanofi Pasteur, part of the French-based Sanofi Aventis Group,
was awarded a contract by the US Government’s National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes
of Health (NIH), NIAID to manufacture the H5N1 vaccine in May 2004.(11)
In April 2007 the FDA approved the Sanofi Pasteur vaccine for H5N1
even though one year before the FDA cited Sanofi Pasteur
for producing contaminated Fluzone vaccines.(12)
The FDA approved H5N1 vaccine is itself apparently not really
effective in event of a human-to-human outbreak of Avian Flu.
On announcing its approval, the FDA stated,
"two injections given 28 days apart may provide ‘limited’ protection
if a pandemic occurs. About 45% of people who got the vaccine
in a study developed an immune response to the virus."(13)
Until now H5N1 has not mutated into a form that can easily spread
from person to person. Is that what the researchers at Sanofi Pasteur
and various labs under contract to the US Government are engaged in?
If so it would be classified Top Secret, clearly.
The respected British magazine, New Scientist, commented,
"If H5N1 does mutate, it is unclear if vaccines developed now would still work
against a pandemic strain. Manufacturers could tailor a new vaccine
to that strain, but current production methods take months." (14)
The magazine noted that research on the Sanofi vaccine
was conducted by the National Institutes of Health as part of
the US Government’s efforts to prepare for a flu pandemic.
The salient question is whether they prepare "for a flu pandemic"
or whether they prepare a flu pandemic.
Why is the US Government spending hundreds of millions
of taxpayer dollars to stockpile this H5N1 vaccine
which likely would not work against such a pandemic outbreak?
On July 2, 2008, the London Daily Telegraph newspaper reported,
"Three Polish doctors and six nurses are facing criminal prosecution
after a number of homeless people died following medical trials
for a vaccine to the H5N1 bird-flu virus." (15)
The report added that the medical staff, from the northern town
of Grudziadz, were being investigated over medical trials on as many
as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors
say involved an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.
Authorities claim that the alleged victims received €3 to be tested
with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but,
according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.
The director of a Grudziadz homeless centre,
Mieczyslaw Waclawski,
told a Polish newspaper that last year,
21 people from his centre died,
a figure well above the average of about eight.
The Polish report did not specify if it was the vaccine being developed
under contract to the US Government Department of Homeland Security
by Sanofi-Pasteur.
However, it is known that Sanofi-Pasteur has been producing
large quantities of such a vaccine at a factory they have in China.
Dr. Laibow reports that the "Pandemic Avian Flu Vaccine" was scheduled
to be delivered to the United States this month by the French vaccine maker,
Sanofi Pasteur, from a facility they own in China, where it is being produced.
The US Government issued its "Vaccine" allocation plan in July.
Laibow fears that a most sinister scenario of a deliberate release
of Avian Flu pathogens on the population that could activate martial law
and forced vaccination with resulting deaths in the millions could be imminent.
Spanish Flu virus revived by Pentagon
In 2003 US Army scientists created ‘Spanish Flu’ virus in the laboratory.
According to a report at the time by the watchdog group,
The Sunshine Project, which monitors biological and chemical weapons
research of the United States Government issued a statement
that "The ‘Spanish Flu’ influenza virus that killed 20-40 million people
in 1918 is currently under reconstruction.
Several genes of the extraordinarily lethal 1918 flu virus
have been isolated and introduced into contemporary flu strains.
These proved to be lethal for mice, while virus constructs
with genes from a current flu virus types had hardly any effect.
These experiments may easily be abused for military purposes,
but provide little benefit from a medical or public health point of view."
They continued, "The 1918 Spanish Flu was highly infectious and
– in comparison to contemporary flu viruses – killed a very high
percentage of those infected, including many younger people.
The Spanish Flu alone caused the medium life expectancy in the US
in 1918 to drop by 10 years. Hence, flu viruses are perceived today
as a serious biological warfare threat. Just two weeks ago,
a 15 million dollar research grant was awarded in the US to develop
protective measures especially against a bioterrorist attack with flu viruses."
The statement added, "Despite the very dangerous nature
of the 1918 virus, efforts to reconstruct it started in the mid 1990s,
when Dr Jeffrey Taubenberger from the US Armed Forces Institute
of Pathology in Washington DC succeeded in recovering and sequencing
fragments of the viral RNA from preserved tissues of 1918 victims.
In the current issue of the scientific journal Emerging Infectious
Diseases new genetic details of the 1918 flu virus will be published."
Most ominously, they report, "But after (partially) unravelling
the genetic sequence of the virus, the scientists went a step further
and began bringing the Spanish flu back to life. Unnoticed by the public,
they succeeded in creating a live virus containing two 1918 genes
that proved to be very lethal in animal experiments.
This experiment is only one genetic step away
from taking the 1918 demon entirely out of the bottle." (16)
They conclude,
"A resuscitation of the Spanish flu is neither necessary nor warranted
from a public health point of view. Allegedly, the recent experiments
sought to test the efficacy of existing antiviral drugs on the 1918 construct.
But there is little need for antiviral drugs against the 1918 strain
if the 1918 strain had not been recreated in the first place.
‘It simply does not make any scientific sense to create a new threat
just to develop new countermeasures against it.’
says Jan van Aken, biologist with the Sunshine Project,
‘Genetic characterization of influenza strains
has important biomedical applications.
But it is not justifiable to recreate this particularly dangerous eradicated
strain that could wreak havoc if released, deliberately or accidentally.’"17
Let us sincerely hope not, but as Prof. Stephen Block, Stanford University biophysicist with years of experience in classified Pentagon and US Government biological research remarked in another context, "We’re tempted to say that nobody in their right mind would ever use these things." Block added, "But not everybody is in their right mind…" 18Sanofi Pasteur delivers H5N1 vaccine
On April 28 of this year in an official Press Release from Sanofi Pasteur US headquarters in Swiftwater, Pennsylvania and Lyon, France, the company stated, "Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccines division of Sanofi-Aventis Group, announced today that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has accepted H5N1 bulk vaccine antigen to produce approximately 38.5 million doses of vaccine to protect against a new strain of avian influenza. Sanofi Pasteur has a multi-year contract with HHS as part of its pandemic program, and will receive a payment of $192.5 million booked in the second quarter of 2008 for acceptance of the bulk vaccine lot."19
Then, on June 16 of this year, Sanofi Pasteur issued the following release announcing that it will, "donate 60 million doses of H5N1 vaccine to the World Health Organization (WHO) over 3 years for the establishment of an H5N1 vaccine global stockpile."
The President and CEO of Sanofi Pasteur, Wayne Pisano, said in the release, "The H5N1 virus is currently circulating in some of the poorest regions of the world and an outbreak of pandemic influenza would most likely hit populations living in areas with limited access to vaccines. This donation of H5N1 vaccine aims to address the needs of those most vulnerable populations. In addition to supporting the efforts of governments," Pisano added, "it is essential that industry collaborates with international organizations such as WHO, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other global health players. This is the best way to build a stockpile of vaccines for developing nations, ready to be deployed on the ground in the event of a pandemic flu outbreak."20
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in addition to being a financial supporter of the so-called Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic, has dedicated its foundation billions to support population control especially inAfrica. Among other projects they, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation, are financing The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, whose head is former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. 21
As the world’s leading influenza vaccine manufacturer, Sanofi Pasteur produces approximately half of the influenza vaccine distributed worldwide. In the US it produced more than 40 percent of the influenza vaccine distributed for the 2007-2008 influenza season. The fact that the US Government has revived the 1918 Spanish Flu virus to make "tests" indicates that anything is possible. There are in this world some people not in their "right mind." God forbid if it is so in this instance.
F. William Engdahl is author of Seeds of Destruction: the Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation
He may be contacted through his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net. (see details on William engdahl’s book below)
Alfred W. Crosby,
America’s Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp.207-8.
The Spanish Influenza was unusual in that it struck infants
as well as elderly. Crosby described its effects:
"a disease that turned people the color of wet ashes and drowned them
in the fluids of their own bodies and inspired names like the ‘purple death.’
Rima E. Laibow, M.D., Weaponized Avian Flu Intelligence Report, in http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=742
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
F. William Engdahl, Saat der Zerstörung: Die dunkle Seite der Gen-Manipulation,
Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg am Neckar,2007, pp. 269-271.
GRAIN, Fowl Play: The Poultry Industry’s Central Role in the Bird Flu Crisis, http://www.grain.org/go/birdflu ,
February 2006. In their report they note, "The transformation of poultry production in Asia in recent decades is staggering. In the Southeast Asian countries where most of the bird flu outbreaks are concentrated—Thailand, Indonesia, and Viet Nam—production jumped eightfold in just 30 years, from around 300,000 metric tonnes (mt) of chicken meat in 1971 to 2,440,000 mt in 2001. China’s production of chicken tripled during the 1990s to over 9 million metric tons per year." (Cited in Engdahl, Op. Cit., p. 288.).
As well, a report by a Canadian organization,
Beyond Factory Farming, described the transmission
likely pathways from the giant industrialized chicken centers:
‘In Thailand, China and Vietnam there is a highly developed industrial
poultry industry which has expanded dramatically in the past decade.
The large poultry companies raise millions of birds, hatch chicks
to supply other intensive poultry operations, export live birds and eggs
to countries such as Nigeria (where the first Highly Pathogenic
Avian Influenza outbreak in Africa was recently reported) and produce
and export feed which often includes "litter" (i.e., manure) in the ingredients.
‘Manure that may contain live virus is spread on surrounding farmland,
or exported as fertilizer, and through run-off may end up
in surface waters where wild birds feed and rest.
Chicken manure is even found in fish farm feed formulations
where it is introduced directly into the aquatic environment.
Wild birds and poultry thathave fallen victim to HPAI in Asia, Turkey
and Nigeria appear to have been directly exposed to HPAI
virus originating in the factory farm system.
In Asia, a flock of wild ducks died from HPAI
—after having come into contact with the disease at a remote lake where
a fish farm used feed pellets made from poultry litter from a factory farm.
In Turkey a massive cull of backyard flocks—and the deaths
of three children—took place after a nearby factory farm
sold sick and dying birds to local peasants at cut rate prices.
Nigeria has a large and poorly regulated factory poultry production sector
which is supplied with chicks from factory farms in China.’
(Engdahl, Op. Cit., p. 289)
Study shows hybrids of bird flu and human flu viruses fit well,
could occur, The Canadian Press, Toronto, undated. May 2008.
F. William Engdahl, Op. Cit., pp. 262-263.
United States Department of Homeland Security,
Health & Human Services Department, Guidance on Allocating
and Targeting Pandemic Influenza Vaccine, p. 2, accessed in http://www.pandemicflu.gov/vaccine/allocationguidance.pdf .
NIH News, NIAID Initiates Trial of Experimental Avian Flu Vaccine,
Washington, D.C., March 23, 2005, accessed in http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/news/newsreleases/2005/avianfluvax.htm .
12 Quoted in, sanofi pasteur, The Largest Company In The World
Devoted To Human Vaccines, April 18, 2007, accessed at
The New Scientist, US Approves First Bird Flu Vaccine
for People, 17 April, 2007, accessed at
Matthew Day, Homeless people die after bird flu vaccine
The Sunshine Project, Lethal Virus from 1918 Genetically
Reconstructed: US Army scientists create ‘Spanish Flu’ virus
in laboratory - medical benefit questionable, 9 October 2003, accessed at
Cited in F. William Engdahl, Op. Cit., p. 277.
Press Release of Sanofi Pasteur, U.S. Government accepts $192 million
of sanofi pasteur H5N1 bulk vaccine antigen for pandemic stockpile:
Vaccine for new strain of virus broadens government readiness program,
Press Release of Sanofi Pasteur, Sanofi Pasteur
to donate 60 million doses of H5N1 vaccine to WHO over 3 years
for its influenza vaccine global stockpile, June 16, 2008, accessed at
William Engdahl, ‘Doomsday Seed Vault’ in the Arctic:
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t,
in Global Research, December 4, 2007, accessed in http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

Heeb Magazine Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition

To be sure, false Holocaust memoirs are hardly a recent phenomenon (Next time,
Art Spiegelman, do a little research—there was no concentration camp called
"Mauschwitz."). But in recent years, they seem to have become both more common
and more crappy. It's no longer enough to simply say you were in a concentration
camp, like Fauxlocaust survivor Benjamin Wilkomirski. No, now you need to have
been led across Europe by wolves, or have a chance encounter years later that
results in your marriage to the hidden Jewish girl who saved you. Bad enough
that these assorted frauds and lunatics should spew this nonsense, but do they
have to do such a bad job of it? Have they no shame?????

The answer, of course, is that they don't. And so while the rest of the world
may turn away or offer the occasional book deal, we cannot remain silent (much
less offer a book deal). What we can—no, must—do, is confront this dangerous
trend the only way we know how—with a self-aggrandizing and somewhat offensive
publicity stunt.

And thus, we unveil the Heeb Magazine Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition. Simply
write a fake Holocaust Memoir recounting your tale of Holocaust survival, get it
to us by April 1, and let us do the rest, which, in this case, involves reading
your submissions choosing a winner, announcing the winner on Yom Hashoah (April
21) and publishing the winning entry in the subsequent issue of Heeb. You're
reading that correctly. You could be published in Heeb Magazine, and who
knows—maybe you could be on Oprah, too?

Contest Rules

1. All entries must be received by April 1, 2009.

2. Entries should be emailed to info@... with the subject line
"Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition" or sent to: Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir
Competition, P.O. Box 687, New York, New York, 10012.

3. Entries may be of any length, but we should tell you that our years of
watching TV have really shot our attention span all to hell.

4. Although real Holocaust survivors may enter, the memoirs themselves must be

5. No erotic fan fiction

6. No close friends or relatives of Alex Trebek

7. We reserve the right to mock any and all entries.

8. We reserve the right to publish and mock the winning entry.

9. "Memoirs" shall be defined as a form of writing, not a collage, short film or
interpretive dance piece.

10. Jewdar will be the sole arbitrator of entries, and will decide the winner.
Don't be too shocked if it's Jewdar's.

11. No parking baby. No parking on the dance floor.

12. No use of the words "tumescent," "engorged" or "moist," unless they are
referring to cake

13. No previously published fake Holocaust memoirs

14. All entries must be the original creations of the entrant.

15. We are not liable for anything, anytime, anywhere, no givesies backsies,


Friday, March 27, 2009

Jews Attack Hot dog Vendor For Non-Kosher Weiners!

Wiener Riots In Jew York

http://wcbstv.com/food/non.kosher.frank ... 65310.html

Jews Attack Deli Owner Caught With Non-Kosher Wiener
The complete IRONY is that the filthy jews will suck off a newborn babys bloody circumcised penis, yet can't eat meat that hasn't been tortured and made to suffer excruciating agony before finally dying! Just ANOTHER reason to HATE the disgusting JEWS!

CBS TV reports: "It was an all-out frankfurter frenzy this week at a popular Jewish restaurant in Brooklyn, as a certain hot dog caused a near-riot. It's not what you would expect: a worker in a NYC eatery caught on tape fending off a group of Jewish patrons with an electric knife. 'I was petrified – stuff was going through my mind,' a patron who didn't want his name used said. 'I want to live. I don't want to get stabbed for a hot dog.'" (At least he didn't start moaning about how he'd been persecuted for three thousand years and Hitler gassed 200 of his relatives in Auschwitz and now he has to face non-kosher wieners for his nosh, oy vay! Ven will it all end?)

"The long-time patron says the chaos broke out when he and a rabbi noticed the frankfurters on the grill were non-kosher, in a restaurant that's supposed to be dishing out the kosher variety. 'The package didn't look kosher,' the patron said. (Probably didn't bear the little circled "U" or the "K" which indicated that the exorbitant secret Jewish tax imposed on thousands of food products has been paid.)

"Some customers were quick to defend the worker, who was surrounded by, according to some witnesses, a hundred enraged people. The rabbi, who originally certified the Shawarma King restaurant kosher, has written a letter to the community in a Jewish newspaper. In the letter, he calls the frankfurter mix-up a terrible mistake." ("Terrible?" The possibility that a Jew might eat a piece of processed meat that hasn't been mumbled over by the shochet and the rabbi, that he might actually eat the same food as us wretched goyim eat, is "terrible?" Can't eat meat that hasn't been tortured to death!! )

"The Right Righteous Hypocritical c**k s**king rabbi tells the community that a worker was sent out to buy hot dogs, and that he went to the wrong market and bought non-Kosher hot dogs. Neighbors say the owner is an honest man. 'He's a very religious man,' one neighbor says. 'He studies every morning, and he's not the type of guy to fool people.'" (Of course he's the type of guy to fool people. He's a Jew. I'm sure Bernie Madoff wasn't the kind of guy to fool people. Right?)

"The popular spot on 13th Avenue was shut down for several days as rabbis examined the premises for non-Kosher food, and threw out equipment that came in contact with the uncertified meat. Customers, and the restaurant's owner, say they're hoping similar incidents don't come up in the future. The restaurant's owner says that, in addition to throwing out equipment, utensils were cleansed with a flame to purge any pieces of the non-kosher food."

MO. Police Targetting YOU!

Missouri Police Wrongfully Target Domestic Terrorist - Ary You One?

By Scott Prentice

Missouri Travel Warning

A local Black Hills businessman who recently brought us this report (which was confirmed as being legitimate) warns all South Dakota residents to stay away from traveling through or to Missouri for fears of being identified as being a domestic terrorist. A recent report sent out to all police and highway patrol departments categorizes harmless U.S. citizens as potential domestic terrorists. Being identified or related to criminal elements are those who are Ron Paul supporters, Chuck Baldwin with the Constitution Party, or Bob Barr. The report goes on to group people who are pro-life or have paraphernalia associated with the Constitution, Campaign for Liberty or believe in the New World Order who President George Bush Sr. talked about in one of his famous speeches.

The Center is described as “the mechanism to collect incident reports of suspicious activities to be evaluated and analyzed in an effort to identify potential trends or patterns of terrorist or criminal operations within the state of Missouri. MIAC will also function as a vehicle for two-way communication between federal, state and local law enforcement community within our region.

The internet buzz went ballistic (pardon the pun) when Missouri Governor Jay Nixon defended the report by stating, “Getting information, especially public information, out of our fusion center out to local law enforcement agencies as we do every day and we’re going to continue to do,” said Nixon. “Any way they take that information and can analyze what the threat levels are is important to make sure the public stays safe.”

"Are we going to get pulled over and ran through the 1st Degree or even arrested for having a Ron Paul sticker or some other offensive display on our cars when we drive through Missouri? I'm not willing to chance it and highly recommend everyone in South Dakota and the surrounding states to take serious caution when headed that way." stated our local friend. Adding, "I think the scariest part is not knowing what they are doing with this information. Maybe they just notice something on your car and then add your license plate numbers to a database is bad enough. It is this type of training and brain washing that leads to civil unrest and makes us all feel very uncomfortable if not fearful of our government."

We are posting the MIAc Report here for you to take what ever measures you feel necessary to make yourself and your family comfortable before traveling to or through Missouri.

A letter also came into our office from the Constitution Parties office (attached below) and the fact that the document clearly constitutes libel and defamation has not gone unnoticed by Chuck Baldwin, Ron Paul and Bob Barr, who have agreed to pursue legal action if the report is not withdrawn. One email we received about this report said this:

1984 is now here in 2009

I am a U.S. Citizen and have the records to prove it.
I am white.
I am a 50-year old male.
I am a Christian.
I am a self-employed businessman.
I am a home-owner.
I am a Tax-Payer
I am a Member of the Constitution Party.
I am a home-schooler.
I am Pro-Life and Pro-Family
I am married to a woman
I am a Member of the NRA and I own several guns including handguns.
I am a Big Believer in the principles of our Constitution
I am a fan of Ron Paul, U.S. Senator
I am now profiled as a TERRORIST in the eyes of The US Government
I am very concerned about our future.

Hello, My life has now changed forever. Where
I go. How long I am there. Who I visit with. What I talk about. This
information will be forever maintained in databases by The Government
of the U.S. and this is so very, very wrong.

Letter from the Constitution Party:

Secret Report Targets Americans

Police Told Which Political Beliefs to Consider “Dangerous”

Lancaster, PA: A secret police report targets millions of Americans as potential “domestic terrorists” if they support the Constitution, oppose unlawful taxation, supported 2008 presidential candidates Republican Ron Paul, Libertarian Bob Barr or Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin (Seen here on Lou Dobbs program ), or if they are opposed to abortion, are against unconstitutional gun control, if they display pro-Constitution bumper stickers or own copies of certain books and documentaries.

The report is part of an ongoing attempt by a number of organizations and movements to characterize law-abiding citizens as “white supremacists”, members of “hate groups” or, more recently as “terrorists”.

The report was generated by the Missouri Information Analysis Center

The Center is described as “the mechanism to collect incident reports of suspicious activities to be evaluated and analyzed in an effort to identify potential trends or patterns of terrorist or criminal operations within the state of Missouri. MIAC will also function as a vehicle for two-way communication between federal, state and local law enforcement community within our region.”

The secret report, distributed to Missouri law enforcement, lists as dangerous legitimate organizations including those who follow a Constitutionally-based ideology in regard to states’ rights, firearm ownership, free speech and sanctity of life.

The Constitution Party , the fastest- growing third party, subscribes to the Constitutionally- based, limited role of the federal government and calls on members of all political ideologies to voice strong opposition to smear campaigns that demonize Americans because of their political beliefs.

The Constitution Party made numerous calls to MIAC and was told an “officer” would respond to questions regarding this report.

No one at MIAC returned our calls.

The MIAC report states “rightwing” militia movements “continuously exploit world events in order to increase participation in their movements. Due to the current economical and political situation, a lush environment for militia activity has been created.”

The terms “constitutionalist” and “white supremacist” are often used interchangeably.

Page 7 of the report warns law enforcement that “militia members most commonly associate with 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members to display Constitutional [sic] Party, Campaign for Liberty or Libertarian material. These members are usually supporters of former presidential candidate:[sic] Ron Paul Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr.”

Issues of concern to those listed by MIAC as reason for law enforcement to label them “terrorists” include: Opposition to illegal immigration, implementation of RFID (radio frequency identification) and the planned merger of the US, Canada and Mexico (North American Union). The so-called “militia movement” contains people who own copies of the late Aaron Russo’s anti-tax documentary America: Freedom to Fascism.

Members of a so-called “patriot movement” are described as being “dangerous” to police in a section of the report titled “You Are the Enemy” which states:

“The militia subscribes to an anti-government and NWO mindset, which creates a threat to law enforcement officers. They view the military, National Guard, and law enforcement as a force that will confiscate their firearms and place them in FEMA concentration camps.”

The MIAC report distributed to Missouri law enforcement is a more virulent version of a similar report compiled by the FBI in Phoenix, AZ during the Clinton administration (see page one and page two of the document). The Phoenix FBI document calls “defenders” of the Constitution “right-wing extremists.”

Constitution Party 2008 presidential and vice presidential candidates Chuck Baldwin and Darrell Castle, along with CP National Chairman Jim Clymer, are available to discuss this disturbing report and the severe limitations it seeks to impose on free speech.

Inquiries regarding this secret report may be made to: MIAC at 866 362 6422.

To see where citizens are encouraged to submit a report that someone could be a “terrorist” click HERE.

Take Action Now!
1. Call the St. Louis Chamber of Commerce and say you will not be visiting Missouri out of concern of being PROFILED.
(314) 231-5555
2. Call the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission and tell them you won't visit Missouri because of "political profiling". (800) 325-7962
3. Call the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) and tell them their smear campaign is not acceptable.(866) 362-6422 and (573)-526-6115

To unsubscribe from CPNC newsletters click here.
Please visit our website at http://www.constitutionparty.org/ Site Meter