The Incredible Shrinking Holohoax

The Holocaust Reviewed: Part One

How Many Jews Were Killed?

The significance of the Holocaust, or the alleged mass murder of six million
Jews by Nazis during World War Two, lies not so much in its effect upon Nazis or
Jews, but in its use to suppress any discussion or argument on the topic of race
since the end of the Second World War. For this reason alone, an overview of the
basic facts surrounding the Holocaust is of critical importance.

NAZIS ESTIMATE 4.5 MILLION JEWS UNDER THEIR CONTROL

The Nazis themselves said that they only had 4.5 million Jews under their direct
control (see the analysis of the Wannsee Minutes) and they would have, in 1941
at least, when that estimate was made, had no particular reason to lie.

This figure is of particular interest when it is considered that as of 1988,
some 4.3 million claims for compensation had been filed against the West German
government by Holocaust survivors, according to the Federal German government.

Despite this, estimates by non-Nazi sources of the numbers of victims of Nazi
concentration camps has varied wildly from six million to 11 million, depending
upon which source one cares to consult.

THE ORIGIN OF THE SIX MILLION FIGURE

The figure of six million was arrived at on the basis of two sources: first on
the evidence of a former SS officer, Wilhelm Hottl, who before the Nuremberg War
Crimes Trials stated that Adolf Eichmann, head of the Jewish Division of the
Gestapo, had told him that 4 million Jews had died in concentration camps and 2
million had died "elsewhere". (Trial of the Major War Criminals before the
International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, Germany, Vol. XXI, Doc, 2738-PS, p.
85).

The other source for this is a statement taken from the former commandant of the
Auschwitz camp, Rudolf Hoess, who in a written statement declared that four
million Jews had been killed at Auschwitz alone. Hoess was hanged at Auschwitz
by the Soviets immediately after making this statement.

This figure quoted by Hoess is however universally acknowledged as being too
high, especially as Hoess was relieved of his command of Auschwitz in 1943, long
before the camp was closed down, and as such would not have been able to tell
with any certainty how many Jews passed through its gates by August 1944.

JEWISH SCHOLARS DENY SOAP, LAMPSHADES HORROR STORIES

At the end of the war it was claimed that the Dachau and Bergen-Belsen camps in
Germany (from where the horrific pictures of scores of dead bodies emanated) had
operating gas chambers; and that in camps in Poland, Jews had been killed in
"steam chambers" or had been skinned to make lamp shades, gloves and their body
fat made into soap.

All of these horror stories have in the subsequent years been refuted by all
serious scholars, including the leading Jewish scholar on the issue, Raul
Hilberg (who in 1998 was a Professor of Political Science at the University of
Vermont, and author of the world famous book "The Destruction of the European
Jews").

JEWISH ESTIMATE SEES NUMBER OF HOLOCAUST DEAD DROP TO 2.8 MILLION

According to Hilberg, as quoted in an article written by himself in the 1998
Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia under the heading Holocaust, the six camps, their
means of killing and their total number of victims was as follows:

"Chelmno had gas vans, and its death toll was 150,000; Belzec had carbon
monoxide gas chambers in which 600,000 Jews were killed; Sobibor's gas chambers
accounted for 250,000 dead; Treblinka's for 700,000 to 800,000; At Majdanek,
some 50,000 were gassed or shot; and in Auschwitz, the Jewish dead totaled more
than 1 million."

- Raul Hilberg, "Holocaust," Microsoft "Encarta" 98 Encyclopedia. 1993-1997
Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.)"

This only accounts for 2.8 million dead: (as the other camps did not have gas
chambers); if Hilberg's figures are correct, then the number of six million dead
drops, by Jewish estimates, by half to just over 3 million, even if the verified
Einsatzgruppen victims are included.

Hilberg offers no explanation for the fact that the Nuremberg trials (both Hottl
and Hoess) claimed figures twice as large (or in Auschwitz's case, four times as
large); more disturbingly, no attempt is ever made to correct the still quoted
figure of six million which is so popular with the media to this day, and which
has been repeated so often that it is an article of faith for many.

Hilberg, who has spent 36 years studying the Holocaust and the subsequent
Nuremberg trials, has himself often changed his estimates: in 1985, he told a
Canadian court that that five million Jews were killed during the war -
substantially up on his 1998 estimate of 2.8 million. (Scientific evidence of
Holocaust missing, The Sault Star Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, January 18, 1985).

THE SHRINKING NUMBERS OF DEAD AT AUSCHWITZ

The best example of how the figures for the number of Jews killed varies can be
seen from this table: the left hand column is the number of dead as alleged in
the source, stated in the right hand column. From this overview it can be seen
that estimates of the number of people who died in Auschwitz has varied over the
years from 9 million to 73,000.

Number of Alleged Dead in Auschwitz


Source
9,000,000

Cited by the French documentary, Night and Fog, which has been shown to millions
of school students worldwide.


8,000,000

The French War Crime Research Office, Doc. 31, 1945.


7,000,000

Also cited by the French War Crime Research Office.


6,000,000

Cited in the book "Auschwitz Doctor" by Miklos Nyiszli. It has since been proven
that this book is a fraud and the "doctor" was never even at Auschwitz, even
though the book is often cited by historians.


5,000,000 to 5,500,000

Cited in 1945 at the trial of Auschwitz commander Rudolf Hoess, based on his
"confession" which was written in English, a language he never spoke.


5,000,000

Cited on April 20, 1978 by the French daily, Le Monde. Also cited on January 23,
1995 by the German daily Die Welt. By September 1, 1989, Le Monde reduced the
figure to 1,433,000.


4,500,000

In 1945 this figure was cited by another witness at the aforementioned Hoess
trial.


4,000,000

Cited by a Soviet document of May 6, 1945 and officially acknowledged by the
Nuremberg War Crimes trial. This figure was also reported in The New York Times
on April 18, 1945, although 50 years later on January 26, 1995 (see below), The
New York Times and The Washington Post slashed the figure to 1,500,000 citing
new findings by the Auschwitz Museum officials. In fact, the figure of 4,000,000
was later repudiated by the Auschwitz museum officials in 1990 (see below) but
the figure of 1,500,000 victims was not formally announced by Polish President
Lech Walesa until five years after the Auschwitz historians had first announced
their discovery.


3,500,000

Cited in the 1991 edition of the Dictionary of the French Language and by Claude
Lanzmann in 1980 in his introduction to Filip Muller's book, "Three Years in an
Auschwitz Gas Chamber."


3,000,000

Cited in a forced confession by Rudolf Hoess, the Auschwitz commander who said
this was the number of those who had died at Auschwitz prior to Dec. 1, 1943.
Later cited in the June 7, 1993 issue of Heritage, the most widely read Jewish
newspaper in California, even though three years previously the authorities at
the Auschwitz museum had scaled down the figure to a minimum of 1,100,000 and a
maximum of 1,500,000. (see below).


2,500,000

Cited by a famous "witness to the Holocaust," Rudolf Vrba, when he testified on
July 16, 1981 for the Israeli government's war crimes trial of former SS
official Adolf Eichmann.


2,000,000

Cited by no less than three famous Holocaust historians, including Leon Poliakov
(1951) writing in "Harvest of Hate"; Georges Wellers, writing in 1973 in "The
Yellow Star at the Time of Vichy"; and Lucy Dawidowicz, writing in 1975 in "The
War Against the Jews."


2,000,000 to 4,000,000

Cited by Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer in 1982 in his book, "A History of the
Holocaust." However, by 1989 Bauer revised his figures and determined that the
actual number was lower: 1,600,000.


1,600,000

This is a 1989 revision by Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer of his earlier figure
in 1982 of 2,000,000 to 4,000,000, Bauer cited this new figure on September 22,
1989 in The Jerusalem Post, at which time he wrote' 'The larger figures have
been dismissed for years, except that it hasn't reached the public yet."


1,500,000

In 1995 this was the "official" number of Auschwitz deaths announced by Polish
President Lech Walesa as determined by the historians at the Auschwitz museum.
This number was inscribed on the monument at the Auschwitz camp at that time,
thereby "replacing" the earlier 4,000,000 figure that had been formally
repudiated (and withdrawn from the monument) five years earlier in 1990. At that
time, on July 17, 1990 The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The
London Daily Telegraph citing the "new" figure of 1,500,000 that had been
determined by the authorities at the Auschwitz museum. This new figure was
reported two years later in a UPI report published in the New York Post on March
26, 1992. On January 26, 1995 both The Washington Post and The New York Times
cited this 1,500,000 figure as the new "official" figure (citing the Auschwitz
Museum authorities).


1,471,595

This is a 1983 figure cited by historian Georges Wellers who (as noted
previously) had determined, writing in 1973, that some 2,000,000 had died. In
his later calculation, Wellers decided that of the 1,471,595 who had died at
Auschwitz, 1,352,980 were Jews.


1,433,000

This figure was cited on September 1, 1989 by the French daily, Le Monde, which
earlier, on April 20, 1978, had cited the figure at 4,000,000.


1,250,000

In 1985, historian Raul Hilberg arrived at this figure in his book, "The
Destruction of the European Jews." According to Hilberg, of those dead, some
1,000,000 were Jews.


1,100,000 to 1,500,000

Sources for this estimate are historians Yisrael Gutman and Michael Berenbaum
(later of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum) in their 1984 book, "Anatomy of
the Auschwitz Death Camp"; also Dr. Franciszek Piper, the curator of the
Auschwitz Museum, writing a chapter in that book. This estimate was later also
cited by Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum,
writing in The Washington Post on September 8, 1998. The upper figure of
1,500,000 thus remains the "official" figure as now inscribed at Auschwitz, with
the earlier figure of 4,000,000 having been removed from the memorial at the
site of the former concentration camp.


1,000,000

Jean-Claude Pressac, writing in his 1989 book "Auschwitz: Technique and
Operation of the Gas Chambers." This is interesting since he wrote his book to
repudiate so-called "Holocaust deniers" who were called that precisely because
they had questioned the numbers of those who had died at Auschwitz.


900,000

Reported on August 3, 1990 11, by Aufbau, a Jewish newspaper in New York.


800,000 to 900,000

Reported by Gerald Reitlinger in his 1953 book, "The Final Solution." This
figure is notable, considering the fact that it reduces the Auschwitz death
total from the 4,000,000 figure that was widely in vogue in 1953.


775,000 to 800,000

Jean-Claude Pressac's revised figure, put forth in his 1993 book, "The
Crematoria of Auschwitz: The Mass Murder's Machinery", scaling down the figure
from Pressac's 1989 claim of 1,000,000 dead. At this juncture, Pressac said that
of the new number, 630,000 were Jews.


630,000 to 710,000

In 1994 Pressac scaled his figure down somewhat further; this is the figure
cited in the German language translation of Pressac's 1993 book originally
published in French. Again, this is substantially less than Pressac's 1989
figure of 1,000,000.


73,137

This figure was reported in The New York Times on March 3, 1991 and was based
entirely on the wartime German concentration camp records that had been captured
by the Soviets and just recently released. According to this figure, of those
dead, 38,031 were Jews. These records state that the total of all persons who
died in the ENTIRE German prison camp system from 1935 to 1945 were 403,713. To
repeat: a total of 403,713 persons of all races and religions was officially
recorded to have died (of all causes. typhus, old age, measles, etc.-and
execution) in the entire prison camp system over a 10 year period. Of those
403,713 a total of 73,137 died at Auschwitz. Of those 73,137 who died at
Auschwitz, 38,031 were Jews.

- (This table and its contents first appeared in The Barnes Review, January /
February 2001)



Above left: This was the plaque on display at the Auschwitz camp until 1989:
note the "4 million" victims. Above right: This is the plaque currently on
display at Auschwitz (2002) - note the suddenly reduced number of victims to 1.5
million - a casual reduction in the number of deaths by 2.5 million.

GROSS EXAGGERATIONS ARE THE NORM IN HOLOCAUST STORIES

The staggering casualness with figures of dead Jews is illustrated further by a
review of two of the more famous "Holocaust Survivor" books:

- Olga Lengyel's "Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true story of Auschwitz"
(Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972); and

- Kitty Hart's "Return to Auschwitz" - paperback edition by Granada (1981,
1983).

"100,000 EVERY FOUR DAYS" = 6 MILLION IN 8 MONTHS

The blurb on the cover of Olga Lengyel's Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true
story of Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972) quotes the New York
Herald-Tribune: "Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein is quoted: "You have
done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten
(sic) speak."

What does Lengyel say?

"After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and
Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the
time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280
corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency,
functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which
could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000
corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks
well for German industry." (Lengyel, 'Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true
story of Auschwitz' pp 80 - 81).

This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40
days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). This for the Auschwitz camp
alone - not including any other camp.

FURTHER OUTRAGEOUS EXAGGERATIONS

Kitty Hart, a Polish Jewess, wrote in her book "Return to Auschwitz" - paperback
edition by Granada (1981, 1983) wrote the following:

"Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000
bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000
in the same period." (Hart, "Return to Auschwitz" p 118).

This means 26,000 bodies every 24 hours, or 182,000 every week, reaching the
magic 6 million figure in an astonishing 33 weeks, or eight months.

"200,000 EVERY FIVE DAYS" = 6 MILLION IN 30 DAYS

Martin Gilbert, a well known Jewish writer and biographer of Winston Churchill,
holding a senior and supposedly respected position within the academic
community, also glibly passes off the most outrageous figures with regard to
Auschwitz in his book "Auschwitz and the Allies" (Gilbert, Martin, New York:
Henry Holt, 1981). In this book he states:

"The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe's Jews was
unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which
it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were
being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka." (Gilbert,
Auschwitz and the Allies, p.26).

If it is assumed, according to Gilbert's figures, that a minimum of 200,000 Jews
per day were being gassed (he says "hundreds of thousands"), this amounts to one
million every five-days, or 6 million in 30 days.

This is obviously impossible, and makes a complete mockery of the supposed
"academics" who claim to be authorities on the Holocaust.

Revisionist Historians and Forensic Investigation

It is this casual juggling with millions of numbers (in the Auschwitz example
above, the figures differ by as much as 8.4 million) and the serious lack of any
direct physical evidence to support the allegations of mass gassings, which has
encouraged the rise of what is known as revisionist holocaust studies.

Increasingly large numbers of historians around the world are researching the
whole issue of the Nazi concentration camps, some going to great lengths such as
taking forensic samples from the remains of the camps, doing analysis of soil at
alleged mass grave sites and studying in detail survivor accounts of such mass
murders. All of these activities are reviewed in the following sections.

http://www.cephas-library.com/israel/Estimates%20of%20the%20number%20of%20Jews%2\
0in%20Nazi%20Occupied%20Europe%20Differ%20Vastly.htm

Obama Wants To Ban Reloading!! What a Piece of Commie Shit HE turned Out to Be!

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading

Gun Owners of America
April 25, 2009

Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who “wasn’t going to take away our guns”?

Well, guess what?

Less than 100 days into his administration, he’s never met a gun he didn’t hate.

A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn’t have the political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that didn’t keep him from pushing additional restrictions on American gun owners.

It’s called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials. To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really nasty piece of work.

First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the “illicit” manufacture of firearms, what does that mean?

1. “Illicit manufacturing” of firearms is defined as “assembly of firearms [or] ammunition … without a license….”

Hence, reloading ammunition — or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit — is clearly “illicit manufacturing.”

Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be “illicit manufacturing.” And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy definition of “illicit manufacturing.”

2. “Firearm” has a similarly questionable definition.

“[A]ny other weapon” is a “firearm,” according to the treaty — and the term “weapon” is nowhere defined.

So, is a BB gun a “firearm”? Probably.

A toy gun? Possibly.

A pistol grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else.

If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of the other provisions in the treaty:

* Banning reloading. In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to adopting “necessary legislative or other measures” to criminalize illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms.

Remember that “illicit manufacturing” includes reloading and modifying or assembling a firearm in any way. This would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate regulations banning reloading on the basis of this treaty — just as it is currently circumventing Congress to write legislation taxing greenhouse gases.

* Banning gun clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized acts should include “association or conspiracy” in connection with said offenses — which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.

* Extraditing US gun dealers. Article V requires each party to “adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention” under a variety of circumstances.

We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico to define offenses “committed in its territory” in a very broad way. And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of the proposed treaty. So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty to demand to extradition of American gun dealers.

Under Article XXIX, if Mexico demands the extradition of a lawful American gun dealer, the U.S. would be required to resolve the dispute through “other means of peaceful settlement.”

Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on the proposition that the Obama administration would apply this provision in a pro-gun manner?

* Microstamping. Article VI requires “appropriate markings” on firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition — a requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are not technologically possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost.

* Gun registration. Article XI requires the maintenance of any records, for a “reasonable time,” that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database.

ACTION: Write your Senators and urge them to oppose the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center to send your Senators the pre-written e-mail message below.

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

I am urging you, in the strongest terms, to oppose the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

This anti-gun treaty was written by international bureaucrats who are either stupid or virulently anti-gun — or both.

This treaty could very well ban the ability to reload ammunition, to put new stocks on rifles lawfully owned by American citizens, and, possibly, even ban BB guns!

There are too many problems with this treaty to mention them all in this letter. The rest can be read on the website of Gun Owners of America at:

http://gunowners.org/fs0901.htm

Please do not tell me the treaty has not yet been abused in this way by the bevy of Third World countries which have signed it. We do not expect the real ramifications of the treaty to become clear until the big prize — the U.S. — has stepped into the trap.

For all of these reasons, I must insist that you oppose ratification of the treaty.

Sincerely,

Jews Yank Anti-Israeli Billboards, Stops FREE SPEECH!

WWW.STOP30BILLION.COM

Contact: Lori Rudolph, 505-550-9553, lorir@unm.edu Rich Forer, 265-1898, rich_forer@yahoo.com For Immediate Release LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING BOWS TO PRO-ISRAEL PRESSURE: REMOVES BILLBOARDS AND STIFLES FREEDOM OF SPEECH ALBUQUERQUE, NM – An Albuquerque-based billboard company pulled ten billboards today that had featured a political message. The contract between a local grassroots group, the Coalition to Stop $30 Billion to Israel, and Lamar Outdoor Advertising was supposed to be for eight weeks; the billboards were taken down after only three weeks. Correspondence from Lamar indicated that the company had received complaints about the billboards’ message, which said: “Tell Congress: Stop Killing Children. No More Military Aid to Israel.” The Coalition has scheduled a meeting with Lamar officials on Friday. In the meantime, supporters are phoning Lamar to request the billboards be put back up. On April 8th, the Coalition to Stop $30 Billion to Israel erected the billboards throughout the Albuquerque area in order to inform the public about the misuse of their tax dollars, denominated in human lives. The group was motivated by concern for the Palestinian people who had recently been subjected to a massive invasion of the Gaza Strip by the Israeli military. Over 1,400 Palestinians – mostly civilian, including three hundred children – were killed and over 5,000 were injured. In 2007 the Bush administration signed a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Israel over a ten year period beginning in 2008. The majority of these dollars will be used to purchase American-made weapons. The design of the billboard had been approved by Lamar and the billboards’ wording and final image were suggested by Lamar’s graphics designer. According to information from Lamar, it appears that pro-Israel groups may have conducted a campaign to pressure Lamar to remove the billboards. The Coalition believes this is a deliberate attempt to silence its right to free speech because the humanitarian message of the billboards supports equal rights for the Palestinian people, thereby necessitating criticism of Israel. Billboard before it was taken down. Billboard being taken down.

Jews Suppress and Arrest Another Holohoax Denier + How Obama Is Sucking Jew D**k Already

NEWSFLASH FOLKS! THIS IS HOW I KNOW THAT WITHOUT A DOUBT, THE HOLOHOAX NEVER HAPPENED THE WAY THE JEWS SAY IT DID: IF THE HOLOCAUST ACTUALLY DID HAPPEN THEY WAY THEY SAY IT DID WITH ALL THOSE GAS CHAMBERS AND OVENS BURNING 214/7 AND IF 6 MILLION JEWS DID DIE, THEN WE WOULD BE CELEBRATING IT INSTEAD OF DENYING IT!!

Holocaust denier convicted of contempt in Australia

Gerald Frederick Toben was arrested in Britain last year under a European Union
arrest warrant
SYDNEY (AFP)---An alleged Holocaust denier wanted in Germany was found guilty of
criminal contempt in Australia Thursday for defying court orders to stop
publishing offensive material on the Internet.
Gerald Frederick Toben, 64, was convicted in the Federal Court on 24 counts of
contempt of court after continuing to publish material about Jews and the
Holocaust on his Adelaide Institute website, despite 2002 orders to stop.
Judge Bruce Lander said Toben, who will be sentenced later this month, had
steadfastly refused to comply with the law.

For More: >>>>>> http://www.ejpress.org/article/36005

WASHINGTON (AFP) – At a ceremony Thursday remembering millions ( Actually, only the 1.2 million dead ) of Jews slaughtered (Slaughtered? Not just killed, or died or died of natural causes, but slaughtered! I'll bet the author of this news article is a jew) in World War II, President Barack Obama reaffirmed the strong US bond with Israel and vowed to confront Holocaust deniers. (He then got down on his knees and sucked off the ADL and AIPAC leaders in front of Congress to prove it!)

"There are those who insist the Holocaust never happened, who perpetrate every
form of intolerance -- racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, xenophobia, sexism and
more," Obama told a gathering in the Capitol Rotunda organized by the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

"We have an opportunity and an obligation to confront these scourges," Obama
said.

"We have the opportunity ... to commit ourselves to resisting injustice,
intolerance and indifference in whatever forms they may take, whether
confronting those who tells lies about history or doing everything we can to
prevent and end atrocities like those that took place in Rwanda, those taking
place in Darfur," he said. ( notice he doesn't mention the slaughter of MILLIONS of Arabs at the the hands of the treasonous, two-faced, hypocritical JEWS!)

The US president's speech came just days after a UN conference on racism where
Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denounced Israel as "the most cruel and
repressive racist regime." ( Irans holohoax denial is making them the #1 target for attack next! just wait! NO ONE denies the holohoax and gets away with it!)

Obama reaffirmed the "strong and enduring" bonds between the United States and
Israel.

"The nation of Israel rising from the destruction of the Holocaust" was a source
of hope to all those who commit to fighting intolerance, he said.

Among those at the gathering, which was part of the US Holocaust Museum's Days
of Remembrance, were five Poles who between them saved the lives of scores of
Jews and have been awarded the title of Righteous among the Nations by the
Holocaust remembrance organization, Yad Vashem.

"The Righteous (And WHO the hell would THAT be?? The f**king JEWS?????) remind us that no one is born a savior (well, unless you're Jesus Christ, but the k*kes killed him already) or a murderer. These are choices we each have the power to make," Obama said of the Poles as well as the villagers of Le Chambon in France, which refused to turn away or turn in Jews
during the war, and saved 5,000 lives.

Jozef Wolszczak, now 90, and the doyen of the group of Righteous, saved the
lives of 53 Jews in occupied Poland during the war, buying 20 of them for a kilo
of gold from the Germans after a raid, giving 30 jobs in his small factory and
harboring three more in his home.

Tadeusz Stankiewicz's family built bunkers in the woods southeast of Warsaw, in
which 60 Jews hid.

"We did it because it was the only thing to do. How can you watch so many people
suffering and not lift a finger to help them?" Stankiewicz told AFP. (only the people who haven't been destroyed, attacked, black-mailed, threatened or imprisoned or never met a jew would help them)

Ireneusz Rajchowski's family sheltered dozens of Jews in their home, including a
man they helped smuggle out of the Warsaw ghetto.

The rescued Jewish man and his family survived the war. His daughter, Barbara
Gora, was in the Capitol Thursday, along with two more Righteous Poles, Alicja
Schnepf and Anna Stupnicka-Bando, and Krystyna Budnicka, the only member of her
Orthodox Jewish family to survive the war.

"The Righteous teach us ... that if we have the courage to heed that 'still,
small voice' within us, we can form a minyan for righteousness that can span a
village and even a nation," said Obama.

A minyan is the quorum required for Jewish communal worship. More than 6,000
Poles have been awarded the title of Righteous among the Nations, the largest
number of any country.

(Jew-nominated and jew-given )Nobel laureate (and holohoax liar )Elie Wiesel, who survived the Nazi death camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, used his time at the podium in the Rotunda to take on Ahmadinejad. (quite the miracle indeed, considering Auscwuitz was a "death camp" and everyone who went there allegedly died. Except this lying douchebag Weisle and Anne Frank....!!)

The Iranian leader was "the number one Holocaust denier in the world," said
Wiesel, whose mother and sister died at Auschwitz, his father at Buchenwald.

"He used the solemn setting of a United Nations gathering again to insult the
state of Israel in a way that no civilized person should ever do," he said,
thanking the United States for boycotting the UN meeting in Geneva.


source>>>>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090423/pl_afp/usiranwwiiholocaustjews\
historylead

Cancel Your Credit Cards BEFORE You Die!

This is so priceless and so, so easy to see happening, customer service being what it is today.

A lady died this past January, and Citibank billed her for February and March for their annual service charges on her credit card, and added late fees and interest on the monthly charge. The balance had been $0.00 when she died, but now somewhere around $60.00. A family
member placed a call to Citibank.

Here is the exchange :

Family Member: 'I am calling to tell you she died back in January.'

Citibank: 'The account was never closed and the late fees and charges
still apply.'

Family Member: 'Maybe, you should turn it over to collections.'

Citibank: 'Since it is two months past due, it already has been.'

Family Member: So, what will they do when they find out she is dead?'

Citibank: 'Either report her account to frauds division or report her
to the credit bureau, maybe both!'

Family Member: 'Do you think God will be mad at her?'

Citibank: 'Excuse me?'

Family Member: 'Did you just get what I was telling you the part
about her being dead?'

Citibank: 'Sir, you'll have to speak to my supervisor.'


Supervisor gets on the phone:

Family Member: 'I'm calling to tell you, she died back in January with
a $0 balance.'

Citibank: 'The account was never closed and late fees and charges
still apply.'

Family Member: 'You mean you want to collect from her estate?'

Citibank: (Stammer) 'Are you her lawyer?'

Family Member: 'No, I'm her great nephew.'
(Lawyer info was given)

Citibank: 'Could you fax us a certificate of death?'

Family Member: 'Sure.' (Fax number was given )


After they get the fax :

Citibank: 'Our system just isn't setup for death. I don't know what
more I can do to help.'

Family Member: 'Well, if you figure it out, great! If not, you could
just keep billing her. She won't care.'

Citibank: 'Well, the late fees and charges will still apply.'

(What is wrong with these people?!?)

Family Member: 'Would you like her new billing address?'

Citibank: 'That might help...'

Family Member: ' Odessa Memorial Cemetery , Highway 129, Plot Number 69.'

Citibank: 'Sir, that's a cemetery!'

Family Member: 'And what do you do with dead people on your planet???'

(Priceless!!) You wondered why Citi is going broke and need the feds to bail them out!!

My name is Edgar J. Steele.

Call me naive. Lots of people do.

After all, immediately after 9-11, I wanted to believe that it was Arabs who did the deed and it took me a whole week to notice the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

And, once Barack Obama was elected, I called for us to come together in support of America's new president. I never imagined that anybody could be worse than George W. Bush. It begins to appear that I may have been wrong about that, too.

I want to like Obama. In fact, I still do ... personally. After all, he is just so ... likeable. Problem is, things are happening on his watch that continue to fracture America and, in fact, seem to be accelerating her plunge into the political, social and economic abyss.

Give him his due. Obama seems to have settled things down with countries like Iran, Cuba and Venezuela. However, that merely has thrown Israel into a frenzy. Ultimately, America seems to dance to the same tune that Israel already knows so well. Not that Israel controls America, mind you, but the same shadowy cartel that controls Israel does control America (can you say Council on Foreign Relations, boys and girls?).

Change? WWIII is Change, After All

When (not if) Israel attacks Iran, the response will be guaranteed to draw in America, as well. That, in turn, will draw in Russia and, likely, China. So, even Obama's foreign-relations rapprochements seem to be drawing us ever closer to WWIII.

Domestically, things aren't really much better. There is a superficial sheen of action on Obama's part, but the reality becomes graver every day. Sure, he released those government memos showing that torture was authorized at the highest levels of the Bush administration, but that has served to ignite nothing but criticism. Disclosure means that we have tipped our hand and can no longer employ those techniques because our "enemies" now will be prepared, say the critics.

I have yet to hear anybody say that our forbidding torture actually is a good thing. I have yet to hear any real condemnation from officials or the media of the fact that America actually tortured people. That is just how far our country has come from the days of George Washington, who forbade injuring any prisoners because such conduct by his soldiers would "bring shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country." And so it has. So it has. Deservedly so, as well. After all, what have you or I done to bring an end to this shameful practice on behalf of America?

And one guy was water boarded nearly 200 times. 200. Think about it. You'd think that just a single experience of thinking he was going to drown would have been enough to elicit anything useful he might have had to say. 200 times shows that water boarding was being used to mete out punishment of someone who never had been allowed a defense to any charges. I don't hear any criticism of that fact, folks. Makes you proud to be an American, doesn't it?

And the bailouts. Oh, the bailouts. Talk about throwing gasoline on a fire! So we have a problem caused by the creation of money far in excess of the production of goods and services to support it? And we hope to solve it by doing what? Creating even more money, of course. And not just a little bit, either. So much more new money that the word trillion now has gone into our lexicon, just as the word billion went in a few years ago after being an inconceivable concept. How long before we start talking about quadrillions of dollars, do you suppose?

And just who do you suppose is in charge of deciding who gets what bailouts? Why, the same guys that got us into trouble in the first place, of course. That's why the banks and financial fat cats all are being made whole and we are being sold down the river to finance their bailouts. No, Mr. Obama is not making things better economically - in fact, history will show that he made them infinitely worse.

Obummer

People seem to be waking up to the fact that Obama, who never before managed anything so substantial as a fast-food restaurant during his lifetime, just might be in over his head and relying upon the wrong people for advice. That's why his poll numbers are taking a nosedive during what still should be his presidency's honeymoon period.

Even so, I still kind of like the guy. He just seems so naive, is the problem. He is allowing others to dictate policy, both foreign and domestic, and they are the same old clique (all together now: Council on Foreign Relations). That's why the Obama administration actually looks a lot like the Bush administration, folks.

Obama has announced his clear intent to legalize the illegal aliens now in America. Similarly, Obama shows a clear disregard for policing our southern border.

Obama has usurped the upcoming census and placed it under the control of ACORN, the private association of hired guns proven to have committed so much election fraud during the past two elections. Guess what is about to happen to the reported demographics that determine electoral districts and representatives - not that it will make any difference, that is?

In a very recent appellate court hearing (Jewel v. NSA), Obama's Justice Department lawyers actually argued for even greater immunity in conducting warrantless wiretapping of Americans than did Bush's! As a candidate for the Presidency, Obama decried the use of what is known as the "state secrets" privilege by the Bush administration. Yet, as President, Obama now argues for its unprecedented extension, so as to provide unlimited immunity to the government for spying on all of us.

The only reason that congress is not moving forward with Obama's expressed desire to confiscate our guns is the fact that his election created such a boom in gun and ammunition sales that many stores post a picture of President Obama with the legend "Salesman of the Year" beneath it. And just try to go buy ammunition these days.

Ozzie & Harriet: Domestic Terrorists

The Department of Homeland Security, in a report that Obama has refused to disavow, has identified the vast majority of Americans as potential domestic terrorists. Returning military veterans are a danger because of their training, not to mention the fact that they become disaffected by being mistreated by the very government that sent them overseas to fight and die. Good enough to carry a gun and kill Arabs for Israel, but too dangerous to own a gun now that they have returned home.

Opposed to illegal immigration? You are a potential terrorist, says DHS.

Opposed to gun confiscation? Yep, you are a potential terrorist, too.

Unemployed? Can't get credit? Look out, because you could be a terrorist.

Know anybody who expresses dissatisfaction with our federal government? DHS would like you to report those individuals immediately to both itself and the FBI because they could be terrorists.

The U.S. vs. us

Did you attend one of the thousands of "TEA parties" held throughout America recently? The FBI and DHS likely photographed you and recorded your license plate number because you are a prime suspect of being a domestic terrorist. What's more, agents of the FBI and DHS followed orders in covertly gathering this data about attendees, particularly keeping their presence secret from state and local authorities.

Seriously, now - does it sound as though Obama is changing anything for the better? Could things get any worse, do you suppose? In a word - yes. Hold on, because they sure aren't going to get better for a long, long time.

I've just received word that this Spring's record late freeze has destroyed approximately 75% of Oklahoma's 2009 wheat crop. This is a deadly serious fact, folks, one that has been repeated not only across all of America, but also throughout the Northern Hemisphere's entire grain belt. I'm sure that the total damage already has been estimated by government officials, but don't expect to hear the figures anytime soon. The implications are enormous. While I already had been predicting food riots for next year, the current wheat crop failures absolutely guarantee that they will take place.

Obama: Chains You Can Believe In

Get ready for martial law, folks. I predict that we will see it enacted sometime next year, if not as early as this coming Fall.

Get ready for serious food shortages. The climate change responsible for one of the worst winters on record in America is continuing and seems to support an inference that we are entering a "mini ice age" such as that endured during the Middle Ages.

Get ready for rioting in the streets of our cities.

Get ready for gun confiscation.

And all you potential domestic terrorists? Get ready to be arrested and held indefinitely without charges. With luck, we may avoid water boarding, but that is about the best for which we can hope.

Martial law means no transportation, no Internet, no cell phones, no freedom of any sort. Complete lockdown. Possibly in the company of a new "9-11" in the form of the disease pandemic that Dick Cheney so often has promised us. Already, mass media is so controlled that we likely will see no change in TV or the few newspapers that anybody bothers to read these days.

You think things are bad right now? You ain't seen nothing yet.

New America - an idea whose time has come.

My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my web site, www.NickelRant.com, for other messages just like this one.

-ed

Copyright ©2009, Edgar J. Steele

Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article
and its related audio file among private individuals and groups,
post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit
publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

On-Line link to this rant in HTML format: http://www.nickelrant.com/rants/090421rant.htm

My Contribution to the Bullsh*t holohoax Rememberance Day!

Today, in honor of the 700,000 dead Communistic, treasonous, traitorous, back-stabbing jews who died while being imprisoned for crimes against the state, subversion, treason or terroristic activities against the Christian countries of Germany and Austria, I had a small bon fire.
If I had an out door grill, I would have used that. But I threw a pack of Hebron kosher hotdogs on the fire. Well, first I skewered them in a stick. I also made sure to include a circular cut about an inch below the end of the hot dogs. That way when they fry up, they look like their disgusting little kosher jew penises. I'll bet the thought of a kosher penis makes alot of rabbis water at the mouth, just thinking about sucking that fresh blood off a new 1" jew weiner. Do you know what the rabbi says when he sucks the blood off a circumcised dick? "Oy VEY! I'm just a 'rusty fish- hook' away from being finished. " Or how about "I'm almost done! I just have to go up and down about 50 more times...." . What kind of diusgusting people actually WANT to suck new born baby dicks after they mutilate them?? JEWS.
Now some of you may ask, what happened then?? Well, I'll tell you, I left those little kosher schlongs on the fire until they fell off and then I made sure they got cremated really good and then I took a big healthy piss all over the ashes. Because, well, frankly, THAT'S what I think about the filthy God damn jews and their bullshit holohoax lies!
How about a Day of Rememberance for the 66 MILLION Christians the filthy jews killed in Russia from 1918 to 1952?? Where's OUR Holocaust Museum? Oh, THAT'S right! It's not fucking JEWISH enough! Maybe if our so-called Christian preachers got off their asses and quit sucking all that jew-TV pawned stations and started actually representing Christians...
If the holcaust ACTUALLY happened the way the jews say it did, then we would be CELEBRATING it instead of DENYING it!
To all you holohoax survivors, well, it's been a GAS! I know you're all just DYING to get to the nursing home, where you can reproduce because we know that every year, more of you come crawling out of the woodwork. What do they give you jews in your enemas? Viagra?? Perhaps if you kike sons of bitches hadn't killed all the Germans, we could hear the TRUTH about WWII instead of your media lies and bullshit hype and lies.

BW

Why Obama Is Boycotting the UN Racism Conference

Obama Admin Boycots UN Racism Conference
April 18th, 2009 by Subverted Nation

Unfortunately for America, many of it's black citizens thought that Obama would
bring hope and "change", but we can already see that this is not his intention.
It was merely a campaign slogan. An advertising campaign slogan. Meaning, those
who fell for it were SOLD on a lie, like some little trinket you can purchase
from an info-mercial at 3am that never works like it was advertised.

Obama's reason for being elected is because he was chosen to help INCREASE
racial tension in these united states. Surely, if he had such an interest in
ending racism, he would attend the UN conference on racism that is scheduled to
take place next week in Geneva. Obama and his administration have instead
shunned the conference, because it may single out Israel for criticism. Now ask
yourself, if Obama is America's president, with OUR interests first in his mind,
why is he so worried about Israel being singled out? Of course Israel will be
singled out in a world wide summit about racism. Israel is an aparthied state
for jews only. The jewish belief system (not religion) is that all non-jews are
cattle. Something to be exploited and slaughtered at will, as they do to
innocent Palestinians.

This article about the subject states:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090418/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_un_racism_conference;_y\
lt=AjdSQW5XgVlmqRN5nEhP3P0Gw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTJxMGt0amU3BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwNDE4L3V\
zX3VuX3JhY2lzbV9jb25mZXJlbmNlBGNwb3MDNwRwb3MDNwRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3V\
zdG9ib3ljb3R0dQ--

Some revisions — including the removal of specific critical references to
Israel and problematic passages about the defamation of religion — were
negotiated for which State Department spokesman Robert Wood said the
administration was "deeply grateful."

Indeed they are pleased when criticism of Israel is quelched, but it's curious.
What could the "problematic passages about the defamation of religion" be? Maybe
passages that argue against Israel and the jew's attacks on the religions of
Islam and Christianity?

They complain about limits on free speech, but what exactly are these limits?
Are they limits intended to keep jews from using the conference as a platform
for their holocaust propaganda? What affirmation from the first conference held
in Durban, South Africa is it that the U.S. can not endorse? Affirmations that
Israel is an aparthied, racist state? That the jew beliefs and doctrine
encourage and endorse racism against non-jews? Despite all of this, state
department spokesperson Robert Wood says the administration, "is profoundly
committed to ending racism and racial discrimination" and "will work with all
people and nations to build greater resolve and enduring political will to halt
racism and discrimination wherever it occurs." Yeah, but only when it comes to
people speaking out against the jews. The only racism they're concerned with is
the misnomer "anti-semitism", or any exposure of jew crimes and criminals that
can be construed as racism.

A little later on, the article gets to the meat of the problem. "(It) singles
out one particular conflict and prejudges key issues that can only be resolved
in negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians," Wood said. Well, it's
all clear now. The Obama administration refuses to attend a racism summit,
because it might actually point out REAL instances of racism, ethnic cleansing,
genocide, aparthied, and more. All of which is perpetrated by Israel and jews
around the globe, against non-jewish peoples. You see, the jews have no interest
in having THEIR racism exposed. Heaven forbid the summit start to mention the
jew's very large involvement in things like the African slave trade. They have
no interest in their involvement in racial tensions the whole world over, being
exposed.

Looking at the article, we can see that the Congressional Black Caucus even
thought this black (jew) president should send delegates to the conference, but
jews don't see it that way.

Pro-Israel groups in the United States vehemently opposed U.S. participation
while human rights advocates and organizations like TransAfrica and members of
the Congressional Black Caucus thought it was important to attend.

Pro-Israel groups, who have no business in America, should take their ass back
to Israel, and worry about it from there. The jew run Human Rights Watch, again,
steps up to put in it's two cents stating the U.S. should "should stand with the
victims of racism." In this, racial minorities will stand alone as long as Obama
is president, and as long as jews continue to infest everything in this country.

America is a country full of numerous different races, often struggling with
each other due to the influence of our jew infested government, indoctrinating
school system, and jew racist propaganda pushed on us through the media and
hollywood. If you have any wonder why certain races behave certain ways, or why
cultural differences are enough to cause such strife, you must understand that
many are behaving in a manner dictated to them by the jew. Disenfranchised
whites turn to jew run racist groups of neo-nazi crap, while young black men are
taught to wear pants around their ankles and gold teeth. White people are
propagandized with an inundation of "black crime" to make them dislike the black
community, while at the same time, the black community's youth learn that
dealing drugs and selling rap music is the only way of life for them. Or they're
taught that becoming a sports star is the way out of the ghetto. It's a viscious
cycle, but at the center of it all, dishing out the spin like a merry-go-round,
sits the jew.

The way out of this mess for the black man, the white man, the mexican man, and
any other is to thoroughly rid ourselves of the jew. Then, and ONLY then, can
the HUMAN race move forward. I'm urging daily to stop the arguing amongst the
HUMAN race, and fight off this race of DEMONS that is possessing ALL of you to
act in inappropriate manners. This isn't about black and white. Or latino vs.
black, or anything of the sort. It's about good vs. evil. Humans vs. jews. STOP
racism. Get rid of the jew.

For More: >>>>>>
http://www.subvertednation.net/obama-admin-boycots-un-racism-conference/
Source: http://www.subvertednation.net/

Why A Jew Hate What Israel Does

Found this on Yahoo. Have no idea where it's from. BW

Growing up in New York City with a large Jewish population, I
have been on the fringe of Jewish society since I was eleven years old.
In my junior high school (PS 118), many classes were reduced in size by
two-thirds
or more on Jewish holidays.

I grew up assuming that the Jews had a Godgiven right to the land of
Israel. After all, isn't that what the Bible teaches? But in my late teen
years, as a Catholic, I learned the traditional Catholic teaching that the
Church, not some modern secular political entity, is the "New Israel."

The New Testament teaches that through and in Christ, the Church is the
continuation of ancient Israel. Baptized into the Body of Christ, we
Christians become Children of Israel by adoption and grace. This teaching,
is also traditionally accepted by Anglicans and Lutherans, is
roundly denied by large numbers of fundamentalist Protestants, who see the
secular state of Israel as the fulfillment of Old Testament Prophecy. That
view has contributed significantly to American zionist foreign policy.

Still, until I was in my 50s, I continued to believe that there was
certainly nothing wrong with the Jewish state of Israel, and I believed the
Jews had every right to it. I couldn't fathom what those crazy Arabs were
upset by. I realize now that this mental image of the Palestinians was
engendered
by the American media.
It certainly appears the media bias is pro-Israel, and favors the
Palestinians only when their mistreatment is so blatant it can't be ignored.
The cartoon on the Tuesday editorial page has convinced me even further of
this.

I'm still in favor of the Jews having a homeland. The Church's belief that
She is Herself Israel, renewed in Christ, does not imply we would deny the
Jews their rights as a people. And Israel is an accomplished fact: let it
stand. But now that I know in detail the story of this modern Jewish state,
I'm very disheartened by the way the Israelis have accomplished their
purpose.

The Encyclopedia Britannica. hasBegin, Menachem in it, Menachem Begin joined
the militant
Irgun Zvai Leumi, and was a commander of that group from 1943 to 1948.
(Encyclopedia *Britannica, *Volume 2, page 47.) He was our first Zionist
Terrorist.

What exactly was the Irgun Zvai Leumi? The Irgun was
"an extreme nationalist group ... whose policies called for the use of
force, if necessary, to establish a Jewish state on both sides of the
Jordan. Irgun committed acts of terrorism and assassination against the
British ... and it was also violently anti-Arab. . . " (En*cyclopedia
Brittanica, Volume 6, page 382.)

According to Colliers Encyclopedia (Volume 3, page 782), "Another such
group was the Stern Group, or Stern Gang, headed by Yitzhak Shamir. " In
Volume 13, page 343, *Colliers *speaks of "the terrorist groups, the Irgun
Zvai Leumi and the Stern Group."

In the Encyclopedia Americana, contributor J. C. Hurewitz of Columbia
University tells us "the Irgunists claimed that their acts of terrorism
against the Arabs and British largely forced Britain's decision to end its
mandate in Palestine. " (Volume 15, page 438.) These terrorist acts included
the murder of the British representative, Lord Moyne, in Cairo in November
1944 and the murder of Count Folke Bernadotte, the UN-appointed mediator, on
Sept. 17, 1948.

The Americana tells us, "Shamir was believed to have played a prominent
part in planning the murders of a British minister and a UN diplomat."
(Volume 24, page 665.)

I'm very disheartened by the way the Israelis have accomplished their
purpose.

In the Britannica Year Book for 1948, page 577, under the entry
"Palestine" it reads, "Meanwhile the [Jewish] terrorist attacks in Palestine
continued, taking almost every conceivable form. Attacks on airfields and
radar stations, armories and military posts, the wrecking of railway lines
... and bank holdups all bore witness to organization on a larger, dangerous
and ingenious scale, and were by general admission made possible chiefly by
the active or passive support which the terrorists received from the great
majority of the Jewish population [in Palestine]."

Returning to the Britannica (Volume 6, page 382), we learn that "On July
22, 1946 the Irgun blew up a wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem,
killing 91 soldiers and civilians ... On April 9, 1947 [remember Menachem
Begin was at the time leader of the Irgun], a group of Irgun commandos
raided the Arab village of Dayr Yasin [also spelled Deir Yassin] killing all
254 of its inhabitants. " But how many Americans know about the
massacre at Deir Yassin and its direct contribution to the conflict in the
Middle East today? How many Americans realize that "this highly publicized
act terrorized the Arab villagers, who began a mass exodus from Palestine"?
(Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 22, page 143.)

Begin was a terrorist was hardly a symptom of Palestinian fanaticism. And
not only Begin, but Yitzhak Shamir, his friend and successor in the Israeli
government. Why hadn't I ever read about this in the papers? Heard it on TV
or the radio?

The massacre at Deir Yassin and the consequent Palestinian exodus, the Israelis simply took title to the real estate of the fleeing Palestinians as "abandoned property. " When Palestinians tried to
return home, they found they had nothing left to their names.

Ramallah, along with Bethlehem, Nazareth, and a number of other Palestinian
towns, have long been predominantly Christian. Some 25
percent of the Palestinians are Christians, of whom half are Orthodox.
But you get the impression from the media that all Arabs are Muslims.
Have you ever seen a documentary or even a news story focusing on the
Christian Palestinians?

The Zionist slogan "A people without a land for a land
without people," is sheer nonsense, for a very large population of
Palestinian Arabs had lived there for more than a thousand years. Arab fury
at Israel is based not on some sort of wild hysteria: it is the anguish of
people who have been systematically and ruthlessly dispossessed from their
homeland and personal property.

The Zionist movement began sponsoring Jewish settlement in Palestine early
in this century. At first the Arabs and the Jews got along well. But more
and more Jews began to move in before World War 11, and the idea spread
among the Arabs that the Jews were planning to take over Palestine
completely for themselves. The rapid influx at the end of World War 11
increased Palestinian Arab fears. To take over completely was in fact
precisely the plan, and still is. The actions of Begin and Shamir, now
recognized as great statesmen and, unlike Arafat, welcome in the United
States, have made that clear.

So of course the Palestinians were and are upset! You would be too! The
irony of all this is that the Zionists claim all of Palestine on the grounds
God gave it to them 3,000 years ago, but the majority of Israeli Jews are
"not religious." Most of them are agnostics or even atheists. So
it's as if they are saying, "There is no God, but He gave us this land, and
we intend to take it all."

In any conflict it takes "two to tango," and there are of course two sides
to this issue Arabs have certainly committed their atrocities, starting
before World War II. The Arabs have made their mistakes, and in several
cases have failed to take responsibility. Both sides have refused
compromises, and at this date, compromise they must, or we'll all be
destroyed in a new holocaust. Also, I hate "Jew bashing," and I'm at pains
that this admittedly forthright criticism of the state of Israel not be
construed as that.

But it seems "Arab bashing" is quite okay in this country, and we only
faintly hear the Arab side of the story. It's okay to caricature Arabs
unkindly, but no one would dare so abuse the Jews. We all remember how Leon
Klinghoffer was thrown into the sea in his wheelchair by Arab terrorists.
But how many remember that Alex Odeh, a spokesman for the Arab viewpoint,
was also murdered that same week by Jewish terrorists in Los Angeles! Alex
also had loved ones; his murder was as tragic as Klinghoffer's.

Up until the intifada, the media created impression was that the Jews are
always the good guys, and the Arabs the bad guys. Media coverage of the
intifada, however, has brought home to Americans how brutal the Israeli
military very often can be. I sometimes wonder if it has sunk into the
brains and hearts of the American public that most of the Palestinians
killed by the Israeli troops have been teenage boys. I have read about
two who were shot in the head for writing slogans on the wall! Can you
imagine the
outcry if American soldiers were shooting down rock-throwing Black or
Mexicans youthful protesters or gunning down young boys writing
antigovernment slogans on a wall! Ironically, American Jews would be the
first to protest, and justly so!

I have no negative agenda for the Jews. I do indeed wish them well. But in
the name of integrity and decency, let's have more prominent Jewish voices
raised, confessing the Israeli part in the Middle East mess. The whining of
some columnists, "We're always innocent victims, first it was Hitler, and
now it's the Arabs" is being consciously used to manipulate public policy,
and that is disgusting. The Jews were innocent in Nazi Germany. But
the Israelis are hardly innocent of great offenses.

I see some Jewish leaders setting themselves up for backlash, and I wish
they'd take heed. The perception is growing that powerful Jewish interests
wish to control our politicians' votes on, and media coverage of, Israeli
questions. I don't know if that's the truth: but it would help dispel that
perception if vocal and courageous Jewish leaders would encourage both
dissemination of media information about Israel's dark side and public
debate on Israeli issues.

We're told by Israel that its policy is none of our business, but we
American taxpayers are asked to foot Israeli bills. Israel now wants more
dollars, and I'll be very surprised if that gets debated in public. What a
subtle form of taxation without representation! Why shouldn't we publicly
debate this multi-billion dollar issue?

The Arab world can only become filled with rage when virtually every person
in the street knows full well the US has tolerated Israel's continued
incursions into foreign territory and other violations of international law,
but has attacked Iraq, ostensibly for its violations of international law.
The war in the Gulf was certainly not simply a long-term result of the way
the Zionist movement has proceeded in the past 50 or 60 years. The
Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not the only serious issue afflicting the
Arabs. But only if you are blind to or ignorant of history can you fail to
recognize the destabilizing effect Israel's policies have had on the Middle
East. I believe that if the Zionists from the beginning had been willing to
share
Palestine with the native Arabs, without wanting to take over completely,
there would have been no major strife. Contrary to popular opinion, at
several times in history the Jews and the Muslims have gotten along very
well. The Jews rose to great heights in Islamic Spain. When, after the
Reconquista, Isabella and Ferdinand exiled the Jews, the Muslim sultan of
Turkey sent
ships to bring them to his domain! The sultan wrote Isabella thanking her
for sending him her crown jewels.

I believe if Israel today will quit its ruthless expansionism and begin to
respect the God given civil rights of the Palestinians, the strife will be
reduced to the point where there is no physical violence. I would like to
see more American Jews who would like to see Israel change its tactics speak
up openly and loudly, because their voices will be heard in Israel.

Let us pray for peace in the Middle East, that justice and love will
prevail. Let us pray that the Palestinian-Israeli issue will become a matter
of open discussion in this country.

Lets give the coming Anti Racism Summit a chance.

How ZOG Runs America!

Major scandal erupts involving Rep. Jane Harman,
Alberto Gonzales and AIPAC
Gleen Greenwald
Monday April 20, 2009
http://www.salon. com/opinion/ greenwald/ 2009/04/20/ harman/index. html

Other obligations prevent me from writing until later today -- and I intend to focus on Rahm Emanuel's war-crimes-protecti ng proclamation that Obama's desire for immunity extends beyond CIA officers perpetrating torture to the "policy makers" who ordered it (watch today as the hardest-core Obama loyalists start explaining how the UN doesn't matter, international treaties are irrelevant, and war criminals need not be held accountable) -- but, until then, I wanted to highlight this extremely important and well-reported story from CQ's Jeff Stein, which involves allegations of major corruption and serious criminal activity on the part of Democratic Rep. Jane Harman. Here's one crucial prong of the story:

Rep. Jane Harman , the California Democrat with a longtime involvement in intelligence issues, was overheard on an NSA wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department to reduce espionage-related charges against two officials of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel organization in Washington.

Harman was recorded saying she would "waddle into" the AIPAC case "if you think it'll make a difference," according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript.

In exchange for Harman's help, the sources said, the suspected Israeli agent pledged to help lobby Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., then-House minority leader, to appoint Harman chair of the Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which the Democrats were heavily favored to win.

Seemingly wary of what she had just agreed to, according to an official who read the NSA transcript, Harman hung up after saying, "This conversation doesn't exist."

That's not even the most significant part. Back in October, 2006, Time reported that the DOJ and FBI were investigating whether Harman and AIPAC "violated the law in a scheme to get Harman reappointed as the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee" and "the probe also involves whether, in exchange for the help from AIPAC, Harman agreed to help try to persuade the Administration to go lighter on the AIPAC officials caught up in the ongoing investigation. " So that part has been known since 2006.

Stein adds today that Harman was captured on an NSA wiretap conspiring with an Israeli agent to apply pressure on DOJ officials to scale back the AIPAC prosecution. But the real crux of Stein's scoop is that then-Attorney General Alberto Gonazles intervened to kill the criminal investigation into Harman -- even though DOJ lawyers had concluded that she committed crimes -- because top Bush officials wanted Harman's credibility to be preserved so that she could publicly defend the Bush administration' s illegal warrantless eavesdropping program:

[C]ontrary to reports that the Harman investigation was dropped for "lack of evidence," it was Alberto R. Gonzales, President Bush's top counsel and then attorney general, who intervened to stop the Harman probe.

Why? Because, according to three top former national security officials, Gonzales wanted Harman to be able to help defend the administration' s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about to break in The New York Times and engulf the White House. . . .

Justice Department attorneys in the intelligence and public corruption units who read the transcripts decided that Harman had committed a "completed crime," a legal term meaning that there was evidence that she had attempted to complete it, three former officials said. . . .

Then-CIA Director Porter J. Goss reviewed the Harman transcript and signed off on the Justice Department's FISA application. . . . Goss, a former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, deemed the matter particularly urgent because of Harman's rank as the panel's top Democrat.

But that's when, according to knowledgeable officials, Attorney General Gonzales intervened.

According to two officials privy to the events, Gonzales said he "needed Jane" to help support the administration' s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about to be exposed by the New York Times.

Harman, he told Goss, had helped persuade the newspaper to hold the wiretap story before, on the eve of the 2004 elections. And although it was too late to stop the Times from publishing now, she could be counted on again to help defend the program

He was right.

On Dec. 21, 2005, in the midst of a firestorm of criticism about the wiretaps, Harman issued a statement defending the operation and slamming the Times, saying, "I believe it essential to U.S. national security, and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities. "

And thanks to grateful Bush administration officials, the investigation of Harman was effectively dead.

Indeed, as I've noted many times, Jane Harman, in the wake of the NSA scandal, became probably the most crucial defender of the Bush warrantless eavesdropping program, using her status as "the ranking Democratic on the House intelligence committee" to repeatedly praise the NSA program as "essential to U.S. national security" and "both necessary and legal." She even went on Meet the Press to defend the program along with GOP Sen. Pat Roberts and Rep. Pete Hoekstra, and she even strongly suggested that the whistleblowers who exposed the lawbreaking and perhaps even the New York Times (but not Bush officials) should be criminally investigated, saying she "deplored the leak," that "it is tragic that a lot of our capability is now across the pages of the newspapers," and that the whistleblowers were "despicable. " And Eric Lichtblau himself described how Harman, in 2004, attempted very aggressively to convince him not to write about the NSA program.

Stein's entire story should be read. It's a model of excellent reporting, as it relies on numerous sources with first-hand knowledge of the NSA transcripts (and what sweet justice it would be if Harman's guilt were established by government eavesdropping) . It should be noted that Harman has issued a general denial of wrongdoing (but does not appear to deny that she had the discussion Stein reports), and the sources in Stein's story are anonymous (though because they're disclosing classified information and exposing government wrongdoing, it's a classic case of when anonymity is justifiable; and note Stein's efforts to provide as much information as possible about his sources and why they are anonymous).

There are many questions that the story raises -- Josh Marshall notes just some of those vital questions here -- and Harman's guilt therefore shouldn't be assumed. But obviously, given all the very serious issues this story raises -- involving what seem to be credible allegations of very serious wrongdoing by a key member of Congress, the former Attorney General and one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the country -- full-scale investigations are needed, to put it mildly.

===

Harman was allegedly heard saying she'd 'waddle into' the AIPAC case in return for support for her bid to become chair of the Intelligence Committee.

Bombshell: Rep. Jane Harman Caught on Tape Agreeing
to Lobby for Alleged AIPAC/Israel Spies?
Jeremy Scahill
Rebel Reports
April 20, 2009
http://www.alternet .org/blogs/ rights/137494/ bombshell% 3A_rep._jane_ harman_caught_ on_tape_agreeing _to_lobby_ for_alleged_ aipac_israel_ spies/

This is a huge story: Representative Jane Harman, a hawkish, influential "Blue Dog" Democrat "was overheard on an NSA wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department reduce espionage-related charges against two officials of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel organization in Washington," according to a report from CQ Politics:

Harman was recorded saying she would "waddle into" the AIPAC case "if you think it'll make a difference," according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript.

In exchange for Harman's help, the sources said, the suspected Israeli agent pledged to help lobby Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., then-House minority leader, to appoint Harman chair of the Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which the Democrats were heavily favored to win.

Seemingly wary of what she had just agreed to, according to an official who read the NSA transcript, Harman hung up after saying, "This conversation doesn't exist."

The case, known as the AIPAC espionage scandal centers around allegations that at least two AIPAC staff members passed sensitive US intelligence on Iran, provided by Pentagon official Lawrence Franklin, to Israel. In early 2006, Franklin pled guilty to espionage-related charges and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. The case against two indicted AIPAC staffers, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, is ongoing.

Allegations that Harman intervened in this case in an effort to win the spot as chair of the Intelligence Committee have been widespread since 2006, but an FBI investigation into Harman was dropped for "lack of evidence." As CQ Politics reports:

What is new is that Harman is said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap directed at alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington.

And that, contrary to reports that the Harman investigation was dropped for "lack of evidence," it was Alberto R. Gonzales, President Bush's top counsel and then attorney general, who intervened to stop the Harman probe.

Why? Because, according to three top former national security officials, Gonzales wanted Harman to be able to help defend the administration' s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about break in The New York Times and engulf the White House.

When Justice Department officials reviewed the transcript of the wiretaps on Rep. Harman, its attorneys determined she had committed a "completed crime," which, according to CQ Politics is "a legal term meaning that there was evidence that she had attempted to complete it." The Justice Department attorneys wanted to open a case on her, but they needed the green light from top intel officials to confirm it rightly constituted a national security investigation. Porter Goss, who was then the CIA director reportedly approved the investigation and was preparing to notify then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and House Speaker Dennis Hastert and, through them, Harman herself:

But that's when, according to knowledgeable officials, Attorney General Gonzales intervened.

According to two officials privy to the events, Gonzales said he "needed Jane" to help support the administration' s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about to be exposed by the New York Times.

Harman, he told Goss, had helped persuade the newspaper to hold the wiretap story before, on the eve of the 2004 elections. And although it was too late to stop the Times from publishing now, she could be counted on again to help defend the program

He was right.

On Dec. 21, 2005, in the midst of a firestorm of criticism about the wiretaps, Harman issued a statement defending the operation and slamming the Times, saying, "I believe it essential to U.S. national security, and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities. "

Pelosi and Hastert never did get the briefing.

And thanks to grateful Bush administration officials, the investigation of Harman was effectively dead.

On his Salon blog today Glenn Greenwald points out:

Jane Harman, in the wake of the NSA scandal, became probably the most crucial defender of the Bush warrantless eavesdropping program, using her status as "the ranking Democratic on the House intelligence committee" to repeatedly praise the NSA program as "essential to U.S. national security" and "both necessary and legal." She even went on Meet the Press to defend the program along with GOP Sen. Pat Roberts and Rep. Pete Hoekstra, and she even strongly suggested that the whistleblowers who exposed the lawbreaking and perhaps even the New York Times (but not Bush officials) should be criminally investigated, saying she "deplored the leak," that "it is tragic that a lot of our capability is now across the pages of the newspapers," and that the whistleblowers were "despicable. " And Eric Lichtblau himself described how Harman, in 2004, attempted very aggressively to convince him not to write about the NSA program.

There may be some who attempt to portray Harman as a victim of blackmail by Gonzales (and the wiretapping of members of Congress—and other Americans— should be thoroughly investigated) but Harman is a right wing Democrat who was often in sync with the heinous policies of the Bush administration. Over at TalkingPointsMemo, Josh Marshall raises some interesting issues on this story, particularly relating to the wiretap itself:

Among the many questions the story raises are some that Harman should probably answer, but not all. High on my list would be finding out more about the circumstances under which a member of Congress ended up having her phone conversations recorded by the NSA. The article suggests it was a by-the-books wiretap — part of a highly-classified probe of Israeli agents in the US, which led to the indictments of two AIPAC employees — and not one of the `warrantless' ones. But we've seen so much funny business on that front that I'm not sure that's enough information.

In a prepared statement, Harman said: "These claims are an outrageous and recycled canard, and have no basis in fact… I never engaged in any such activity. Those who are peddling these false accusations should be ashamed of themselves."

Hate Crimes Legislation Threatens Freedom of Speech and Religion

Liberty Counsel April 20, 2009 Hate Crimes Legislation Threatens Freedom of Speech and Religion www.LC.org On Wednesday, April 22, the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on so-called “hate crimes” legislation, which would give “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” the same federal protection as race. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) have reintroduced the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (H.R. 1913). Liberty Counsel has published a legal memo explaining how hate crimes laws threaten freedom. H.R. 1913 is not about stopping crime but is designed to give sexual preference the same legal status as race. This legislation is just a stepping stone to regulate the speech of people who support family values. Bill sponsors claim that free speech activities are protected in this version of the bill, but exemptions can be overturned by courts or targeted for later removal. Here is what you can do today to express your opposition to this outrageous Hate Crimes bill (HR 1913). 1. Contact the members of the House Committee on the Judiciary. 2. Contact your Representative. All you need to do is call the capitol switchboard and ask to be connected to your Representative. The capitol has many toll-free numbers: 1-866-220-0044; 1-866-340-9281; 1-888-355-3588; 1-800-450-8293; 1-877-851-6437; 1-877-762-8722; 1-877-762-8762; 1-800-833-6354; and 1-866-808-0065. You can also call 202-224-3121 or go to the House web site for the contact information. Read our News Release for more details. Read the Hate Crimes Legislation Read our Legal Memo on Hate Crimes Laws Today On Liberty Live Our special guest today will be Andrea Lafferty, the executive director of Traditional Values Coalition. Mat Staver will host Liberty Live, from 4-5 p.m. ET (3-4 p.m. CT) and Matt Barber will co-host. Today's topic is the impending danger of so-called "Hate Crimes" laws which is scheduled for a vote this week. Tell your friends to listen and learn how to stop this threat to free speech and religion. Watch online from 4 - 5 p.m. ET (3-4 p.m. CT) at www.LC.org and add your comments to our live blog during the show. The number to call to talk to Andrea Lafferty during the show is (866) 963-2037. You can also listen to an archive broadcast of this show. Please help inform as many people as possible by forwarding this Liberty Alert to your entire e-mail list of family and friends, and encourage them to subscribe. Liberty Counsel does not charge clients for representation, so we depend on individuals, groups and churches who care about advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and the traditional family. Liberty Counsel is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that accepts tax-deductible donations. Donate or order resources from the Liberty Counsel online store. Mathew D. Staver - Founder and Chairman Anita L. Staver - President Liberty Counsel - 1-800-671-1776 PO Box 540774 - Orlando, FL 32854

How To Prevent an Intermarriage

http://jewwatchusa.blogspot.com/


A guide for preventing broken hearts

April 18th, 2009 by AngryGentile

The good news is that jews are in real trouble.

The bad news is that the jews are mixing in with our stock and have plans to
turn this around at the expense of the gentile world.

The jewish population is dropping and is now unsustainable in the long run, in
fact, if things don't change for them soon they are facing extinction. They are
victims of their own politically correct/social agendas. Since the social
upheavals of the 1960's (designed by them) the intermarriage rate (in the US)
has risen almost seven-fold.

According to jewish demographic studies the number of Jews in the world is
declining with a net loss of 300,000 American Jews just in the last decade.
According to jewish ( http://www.haaretzdaily.com/ ) SOURCES it is hard to
accurately determine just how many jews actually plague the earth, but according
to their own figures they number approximately 13.2 million but later in the
same year they revised their figures down to 12.9 million -or 300,000 fewer in
a matter of months. I have seen other figures which put their total population
much higher but their numbers do seem to be thinning and they are scared.

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm

The top twelve Jewish populations in the world are:

1. USA 6,500,000

2. Israel 4,950,000

3. France 600,000 (750,000)

4. Canada (5) 364,000

5. Britain (6) 275,000

6. Russia (3/4) 275,000 (650,000)

7. Argentina 197,000 (250,000)

8. Ukraine 112,000

9. Germany 98,000 (115,000)

10. Brazil (11) 97,500

11. South Africa (12) 88,000 (65,000)

12. Hungary (10) 55,000 (100,000)

(When the jewish newspaper "The Daily Express" on March 24, 1933 claimed that there were only 600,000 jews in Germany and only 14 million jews in the world, this "minimized" the holocaust because it under-reported the number of jews in the world by 2,643,120. In 1949, the jewish experts revised their population estimates for the number of jews in the world in 1939 to 16,643,120, up from the 15,192,089 which they had estimated in 1943. iow, AFTER WWII these jewish sources knew that there were 1,451,031 MORE jews in the world nine years earlier than they knew there were in 1943.

By minimizing the number of jews in the world before the war, The Daily Express minimized the holocaust, which legally is criminal denial of the holocaust.)

Here is another study, "Experts say that some 300,000 Jews emigrated to the
U.S. during the 1990s, but nonetheless, the community lost some 50,000 Jews a
year, mostly to natural attrition."

Whatever the truth is, the fact remains that, the jews are worried. What is
happening is being called a (http://www.jewishpost.com/news/Silent-Holocaust-Gets-a-Voice.html ) " silent holocaust" ( please note that for once, holocaust wasn't capitalized. Awwwwwww) and a ( http://www.forward.com/articles/11292/ ) "demographic crisis" by the highest jewish sources.

Israel is their only source of jewish growth in the world. In THIS article the
intermarriage statistics reveal some of the following points:

"Before 1965, 10% of Jews who married, did so outside the faith."

"In 1985, 52% of Jews who married have done so outside the faith.
Children are being raised as non-Jews."

"Today, 72% of the Jewish people today are
intermarrying, amongst non-orthodox American Jews"

Their problems aren't due to intermarriage alone:

"1 million, or 54% of all American Jewish children under the age of 18 are being
raised as non-Jews or with no religion."

"Fertility Rates are not high enough to replenish the religion."

"Of the population that consists of people who were born Jewish and are Jewish
by choice, only 11% attend synagogue weekly."

One jew (Rabbi Ephraim Buchwald, Founder, National Jewish Outreach Program)
squeals, " Our grandparents prayed for a melting pot. What they got instead was
a meltdown!" ( Which is the jews own fault. THEY voted in the Immigration Act of 1965!)

The writer responds, "So powerful is this meltdown of Jewish life, that Judaism
in America, as we have known it for the last 300 years(there's that number
again), will likely cease to exist in the new millennium." Let us pray!

In a set of (http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/jews-and-jewish-birthrate/ ) OTHER STUDIES the National Jewish Population Survey (NJPS), concluded some of the
following:

"the Jewish population of the United States has, at best, remained static for
the past 50 years, despite the influx during that same period of at least a
half-million Jewish immigrants."

"Once upon a time, it was thought by at least some sociologists that
intermarriage could prove to be a demographic boon. In the aggregate, said the
optimists, it would take fewer intermarried Jews producing children identifying
themselves as Jews to result in a net gain. But nothing of the sort has
happened."

"In a community that has long since ceased to replace its natural losses,
continued low fertility rates mean that the number of children in the communal
pipeline will soon drop sharply."

"But this brings us to the one major exception to the general rule—namely,
Orthodox Jews. Not only do the Orthodox suffer many fewer losses from
intermarriage, but their fertility rate is far above the Jewish norm. As against
the overall average of 1.86 children per Jewish woman, an informed estimate
gives figures ranging upward from 3.3 children in "modern Orthodox" families to
6.6 in Haredi or "ultra-Orthodox" families to a whopping 7.9 in families of
Hasidim."

In another ( http://www.jewcy.com/userblog/intermarriage ) ARTICLE the writer
finally lets some real truth out when he whines, "Many of my fellow Jews today
are fearful that interfaith marriages between Jews and non-Jews will dilute and
adulterate our racial purity,"

Did you catch that? Yes, he said racial purity! This is not about faith, these
people are biologically different than us, and they finally admit it. He goes on
with a bunch of jewish racist bullshit but admits that he "started to date
non-Jews with a vengeance" and finally married one and spawned two half jews,
both bad for his race and terrible for ours (the human race).

Here are a few examples directly out of this BOOK "How To Prevent an
Intermarriage/ A guide for preventing broken hearts":

"Jewish ceremonies for mixed marriages are a tragic and deceptive farce."

"We have no special interest in swelling our number by conversions"

"There are a number of bad reasons not to intermarry, some of which actually
border on racism. First among these is the argument that Jews and non-Jews are
different and shouldn't mix."

"Intermarriage is a recognized threat to the survival of the Jewish people.
There is a sore need to meet this threat."

"The United States has a 50 percent divorce rate among people of all
backgrounds. Intermarriages suffer an even higher divorce rate - an estimated 70
percent."

"Intermarriage is an extremely serious violation of the Torah. In one sense, it
is the ultimate violation. Intermarriage is a direct contradiction to the
preservation of Judaism. It is expressly forbidden by the Torah (Deuteronomy
7:3-4)."

"Virtually everyone agrees that it is wrong, even immoral, to aid in the
destruction, actively or passively, of an endangered species, especially if that
species plays a vital role on the planet."

"Are you willing to die for the Jewish People? If so, then realize that it is
better to live for them! Go find a Jewish woman you can love. Your children will
be Jewish, part of the people for which you are willing to die!"

"If you want to say that many Jews feel superior to other people, you're right."

And the spawn of such a unions are described this way, "They are recognized as
non-Jews among Jews and as Jews among non-Jews." yes, exactly…we abide by the
one drop rule as far as this goes.

So what does all this mean?

First off, if you already don't already, steer clear of jews!

Secondly, never mix with them even in social circles.

Thirdly, do everything in your power to drive a wedge in any jewish/gentile
relationship that you can.

Remember, these filthy jews are prone to many genetically specific diseases they
want to both spread to us and dilute out of their own demonic bloodline:

Ashkenazi diseases:

* Bloom syndrome
* Canavan disease
* Cystic Fibrosis
* Factor XI Deficiency (aka Hemophilia C)
* Familial Dysautonomia (Riley-Day Syndrome)
* Fanconi anemia
* Gaucher Disease
* Type 1a Glycogen storage disorder
* Maple Syrup Urine disease
* Mucolipidosis Type IV
* Niemann-Pick disease
* Non-Classical Adrenal Hyperplasia
* Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss and Deafness
* Tay-Sachs disease
* Torsion Dystonia

Genetic diseases disproportionately affecting the Sephardic jew population :

* Beta-Thalassemia
* Familial Mediterranean Fever
* Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency
* Type III Glycogen Storage Disease

The intermarriage between jew and gentile has nothing to do with "love", these
demon spawn have a hunger for the flesh of "shiksas" a derogatory word for a
gentile woman. The word shiksa is derived from the Hebrew term sheketz, which
means "abomination", "whore", "impure," or "object of loathing"(This is where the term
"chick" is derived from to describe a woman so never use this word again). There
are many reasons for this strange attraction even though they feel so negatively
about us, explore the reasons for yourself at the sources given. Just do
everything in your power to end this horrible trend in any way you possibly can.

To sum it all up, the jews know that the only viable way they are to keep their
tribe alive lies with the fate of Israel, the only place on earth that their
numbers are growing, so expect nothing but the expansion of its borders
ultimately meaning a (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/israel/images/greater-israel-map4.j\pg ) "GREATER ISRAEL" . Their global web of parasiticism will continue. The ZOG of America will likewise continue to prop up their criminal empire by condoning,
or looking away from, their guaranteed future land grabs which will be paid for
with our own tax American tax dollars, meaning nothing but constant war in the
foreseeable future. Iran is next on their hit list, necessary to eliminate to
fulfill their future plans, which they will undoubtedly pull us into one way or
the other. Watch out!

For More: >>>>>>
http://www.subvertednation.net/how-to-prevent-an-intermarriage-a-guide-for-preve\
nting-broken-hearts/
Source: http://www.subvertednation.net/