Duke Faggot Pedophile LOVES The Anti-Hate Laws!

DUKE UNIVERSITY PEDOPHILE WOULD BENEFIT FROM HATE BILL

By Rev. Ted Pike

My parents were pioneer Christian, conservative leaders and broadcasters. In the late fifties after the aborted 1956 Hungarian Revolution, they met a number of passionately anti-communist Hungarian exiles. These refugees related how in 1918 Jewish Bolshevik Bela Kun, after overthrowing the Hungarian government, imposed homosexuality and its values on all levels of Hungarian society, down to kindergarten. Kun's goal was to break Christian, anti-communist resistance. He wanted to remake Hungary's youth into mindless fodder for socialism and revolution. After all, Lenin (whose mother was Jewish) said, "A revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals."

Today, Jewish activists of the Anti-Defamation League continue the work of their spiritual and political ancestor, Kun; they forcefeed society and the youngest children with pro-homosexuality. Three monstrous ADL hate bills (including recently introduced ENDA, The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, HR 3017) are moving forward in Congress. (See, New ADL Hate Bills Attack America) ADL's legislation gives it the same behind-the-scenes federal power to corrupt America that Kun wielded over Hungary.

In Senate Judiciary hearings last week, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder boldly testified that the federal hate bill, S. 909 will not protect all citizens of differing races, religions and genders from violent hate crimes, as it claims to do. Whom did Holder say it was designed to truly protect? Homosexuals. This includes homosexual pedophiles.

Here's an example of one such pedophile S. 909 would rush to assist if it were law today. Last week the FBI and Washington D.C. police announced arrest of homosexual Duke University administrator Frank Lombard for trying to persuade an undercover police officer to have sex with Lombard's six-year-old adopted black son. The affidavit said Lombard sexually molested the child, describing himself as a "perv dad for fun." The boy was reared by Lombard and his homosexual partner. (See, Gay Duke U. Official Attempts to Sell Black 5-Year-Old Son for Sex: MSM Out to Lunch. NewsBusters.org 06/29/2009)

Attorney General Holder testified that the federal hate law would give homosexuals, regardless of their guilt or innocence, preferential rights and importance over the majority of "straight" Americans. This means that if the officer lost his cool and called Lombard a faggot, striking him, and Lombard screamed, "Hate crime!" the whole federal, state, and county law enforcement and justice establishment would be obligated to come to the aid of Lombard with triple speed.

But police officers, as Holder testified, have no special rights under the hate crimes bill. Instead of being charged with simple assault, the undercover officer would face a federal felony rap which could total ten years in prison. After spending at least $10,000 for the best attorney he could find, the officer could spend tens of thousands in legal fees if the case dragged on or was appealed.

On the other hand, if Lombard learned the officer's identity and struck him, crying "Pig!" the officer would have no special status as the member of a federally group. He could not scream "Hate crime!", but would have to find justice through conventional law.

Who is Really Intimidated?

ADL and Holder say they want S. 909 to end "intimidation" of persecuted homosexuals. Actually, S. 909 is designed to intimidate the rest of us -- white Christian "straight" Americans.

In 1918, Bela Kun proved a whole nation could be subjected and a generation corrupted under united, unrestrained pro-homosexual federal power. That's the terrifying agenda ADL's three pending hate laws envision for America.

ADL'S FEDERAL HATE LAW S. 909, MAKING ALL THIS POSSIBLE, HAS PASSED THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND COULD PASS THE SENATE NEXT WEEK. FIGHT BACK!

The best way to fight is to call members of the Senate (names HERE at www.truthtellers.org) and ask staffers to watch our new NPN video "Holder Admits: No Equality under Hate Bill." Video footage of the Senate Judiciary hearing shows Holder testifying that the hate bill gives special services and protection to homosexuals, not the rest of us.

Call now and leave this message: "Attorney General Holder testified in Judiciary that the hate crimes bill discriminates and will not protect all Americans against hate crimes. Please ask your staff and Senator to watch Holder's shocking testimony in the 10-minute video at www.truthtellers.org." (See video at the top of truthtellers.org) Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121. Don't be daunted if some Senate staffers don't let you finish this message. It proves they are getting the message big time! Keep calling next week.

The arrest of homosexual pedophile Lombard is a wake-up call to the fact that pedophiles deeply infest the homosexual community and we must make sure they don't acquire special federal protection under S. 909. Wake the Senate this week by persuading every Senate office to watch NPN's blockbuster video.

The child you save from a pedophile may be your own.

Segregation: A Need That Just Won't die

SEGREGATION: A Need That Won't Die

What the younger generation of American whites just don't understand is that before the so-called "civil rights movement", blacks and other dark races were segregated from white society, not because of social convention or tradition, but because of common sense and sanitation. It was a well-known fact back then(and now)that blacks especially, are extremely nasty in their personal habits, to the point where one black can leave a public restroom completely unusable by the next white. Segregatingbathrooms was a necessity. Blacks however, saw it as discrimination and racism for several reasons.
First, they saw absolutely nothing wrong with their filthy ways. Trashing a bathroom was no big deal to them, and they didn't understand what all the fuss was over. One look inside a black hovel would tell you why. As a law enforcement officer, I had to enter many such black residents, and most of those times my gorge would rise from the horrendous filth and stench of the places. It's how they live...

Second, they loved being a thorn in whitey's side. If it pissed whitey off or inconvenienced him, they'd do it. It was really that simple. Blacks have always hated whites for several reasons, the primary one being jealousy. Whites are far smarter, better looking, possessing greater integrity and self control, and can easily thrive in this advanced society. Blacks on the other hand, are lost. They must choose between predator or parasite to survive because they don't possess either the intelligence or the drive to work to support themselves honestly. That takes inner character, an advanced trait which only the white man possesses. Every time they see a successful white man he reminds them of their inferiority by simply existing. There is no cure for this hatred other than segregation of the races, which should have been left untouched in the first place. Blacks whined about it, sure, just like children whine when their parents refuse to let them drive the car at 14. They want what they're not ready for. Blacks were contained and had strict limits placed on their behavior, and society flourished. The black man was far better off as a race as well. No gangs, drugs, drive-bys, stuffed prisons and millions dead every year from inner city violence. Most liberals in this country are simply dupes who are, and have been, the naive' tools of the Jewish agenda to destroy this nation and race. Thirdly, blacks hate whites because
of slavery. In their limited minds they just can't distinguish between the Jew and the Gentile. White is white. So even though it was the JEWS who brought them here and sold them into slavery, they blame the American white man, almost none of which ever owned a slave or even saw one. They are also too stupid as a people to realize and appreciate the great sacrifice white Gentiles made to free them from slavery, costing whites the lives of over 500,000 of their sons. Instead they spend their entire lives parasiting off and hating the one race that's ever tried to help them. That's typical black gratitude...

Since segregation ended, blacks have also been free to breed uncontrolled. Our forefathers saw the danger in this, and instituted mandatory sterilization programs of nigger mammies on a massive scale all across the country. And even with this program in full swing, blacks were continuing to breed like roaches. Up until 1964, California still had it's sterilization program in place. Though now center of the liberal movement in this country, California was at that time, the most die-hard of the segregationists and a proponent of black population control. They saw a direct link between serious felonies and the increase in the black population. But with the advent of "civil rights" all these programs were stopped, and blacks were allowed to run hog-wild in our society. The results are all around us...

Integration and the "diversity" propaganda being pumped at our young by the liberals, is evil in the extreme. A tree is known by it's fruits. The fruits of integration have been a new race of semi-intelligent, ugly mulatto children that can't fit into either world, violent crime against whites on a genocidal scale, social decay, moral corruption, rampant disease, over-full prisons, overworked judicial systems, choked hospitals, rampant drug use, and every other evil imaginable. Our very culture has been polluted by their lower morals and their gutter slang words. To someone who knew this country before integration, this is all disgusting and enraging in the extreme. The liberals can spout high sounding platitudes until the sun burns out, but it will never alter the fact that it's a dismal failure and should have never been instituted. Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind. Every past great civilization on earth learned that to exist,
there must always be inequities at some level. Not everyone can have their cake and eat it too. To prevent a great evil we must, in many cases, tolerate a small one. And compared to the results of allowing these apes to run loose in white society, segregation is no evil at all, but a stark necessity if we are to survive as a culture, a nation, and a race. The Jews knew this, and that's exactly why they fought for civil rights. They want the United States destroyed...

I can't turn on the TV anymore without almost immediately being bombarded by liberal propaganda, promoting "the joys of diversity" and how anyone opposing it is an evil, bigoted, unintelligent, intolerant, unpatriotic racist. These fanatics have brought out the big guns now, and I even see this theme craftily interwoven into the plots and storylines of almost all the major network shows on TV. Also our poor kids are having their impressionable little minds so severely twisted by their rabidly liberal teachers, that we can no longer trust our own children with family secrets for fear they'll run turn their own parents in to the state. They actually encourage our kids to do this, never telling them the dire consequences to their parents..and to them if they do so. Being a "good little liberal" will throw Mom and Dad in prison, cause them to lose everything, get the little snitch tossed in Juvenile Hall where young buck niggers will stomp
and rape him repeatedly. Now he's a ward of the state and his parents are in prison. And years later, if his parents ever get out of jail, they'll disown the little turd for life. A high cost for listening to liberal evil...

You're known by your fruits...

I don't care what the liberals and so-called "minorities" say or want. The fruits of "their way" are plain for all to see: destruction and chaos; the two classic goals of Evil. That's right; think about that for a second.The ultimate goal of Evil in the world and in the universe is destruction and chaos. Those are the "fruits" of Evil. Any wise person knows this. And if the end results of integration, civil rights, and diversity are destruction and chaos, does it take a brain surgeon to figure out they're evil? And what does that make those that are so vehemently promoting it, even in the face of such horrendous consequences as we have today? That's right; EVIL. The liberal movement and agenda are evil through and through. There is no debating it, no discussing it, and no doubting it. The only real question left is; What are YOU going to do about it? Are you going to continue to just lay up and hope that "somebody else" does something about it before it's too late, or are you going to finally make the necessary sacrifices your forefathers made to save our rights, our freedoms and our very race from extinction? Because believe
me brothers, that IS their goal. They want you and all your loved ones DEAD, and all other whites as well! And unless you get up and join other patriots and start seriously fighting back, they'll get their wish...

Remember that integration, diversity, and racial tolerance are all tools for your destruction. They serve no other purpose. Name one good thing that's come out of any of them. You can't because there hasn't been.
Segregation is a need that won't die. We either re-institute it, or a race war will shortly arise. The tensions of forcing our vastly different species together is causing too much friction and destruction to go on much longer without exploding. Our government isn't stupid folks, they know this. In fact they're counting on it!They intend on using it as the excuse they need to implement martial law nationwide. We must be ready when they do. One day soon now, we'll either be free from this evil, or it will no longer matter because we'll all be dead. The choice is in your hands. It all depends on whether or not you get up out of that damned
easy chair and get serious. We're out of time...

JOOM

Anarchy With Honor-Nickle Rant

Anarchy with Honor
by Edgar J. Steele

June 24, 2009

"The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists."
--- Ernest Hemingway, “Notes on the Next War: A Serious Topical Letter” (1935)

Audio files of Anarchy with Honor: Formal Rant Only - (16 mb, 18 min) streaming mp3 Entire Broadcast - (26 mb, 120 min) mp3 streaming mp3

6-10-09 - Why He Did It - And Why Von Brunn Won't Be The Last mp3 audio 5-27-09 - The Ties That Divide mp3 audio 5-13-09 - Broken mp3 audio 5-03-09 - REJECTED mp3 audio 4-29-09 - Flu Happens mp3 audio 4-22-09 - Obummer mp3 audio 4-15-09 - Idaho - You Can See New America From Here mp3 audio 4-8-09 - Christians? In America? mp3 audio 4-1-09 - Ed Gov, Not Fed Gov mp3 audio 3-25-09 - We're All Terrorists Now mp3 audio 3-18-09 - Second Annual State of the Revolution mp3 audio 3-11-09 - The Road to Hell is Paved with Bailout Money mp3 audio

My name is Edgar J. Steele.

The ongoing tension between tyranny and freedom is a recurring theme in my writing. More, perhaps, than any other. "The Circle of Strife" is what I have dubbed the never-ending stampeding of a populace from freedom to tyranny, and back again, in all nations down through history.

Today, we see America sliding ever more deeply into a morass of excessive institutional control of its citizens - as clear a case of mounting tyranny as ever has been seen.

Individualism vs. Collectivism

To argue about differing economic models or alternate political systems is to engage in the wrong argument altogether. What I have noticed that really counts, regardless of the form of societal organization under discussion, is the degree of individualism versus collectivism.

Individualism is freedom, pure and simple. Collectivism is lack of freedom - the control of individuals by groups, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. Even so, voluntary control of the individual inevitably becomes involuntary, I have noticed, the greater it expands.

Many in America today view our subjugation to the "greater good" of society to be a voluntary yielding up of individual liberty. A growing segment of the population, however, views the galloping expansion of institutional control with alarm.

The lack of understanding of the difference between individualism and collectivism was brought home to me last week by a caller to my radio show to whom, by prearrangement, I had agreed to give greater time and sway - almost a guest interview, in fact. At one point, he identified himself as a National Socialist, then went on to sing the praises of Adolf Hitler and the economic miracle wrought in pre-WWII Germany. All well and good, I noted, but Hitler did end up being responsible for wrecking Germany and there can be no dispute that he LOST, after all. And, had he won, Hitler scarcely would have given up the reins of power he had gathered into his hands.

Hitler was a collectivist of the first order. Perhaps that is why he held such contempt for Marxism: a competing collectivist, after all.

My caller/guest then suddenly claimed an admiration for Thomas Jefferson, one of my personal heroes and the very model for individualism. Jefferson advocated regular revolution, just to keep things fresh and control out of the hands of despots. Jefferson despised central government advocates like Madison.

I noted the disparity between my caller/guest's two claimed positions and received little by way of explanation. He was confused, you see. Most are. As it turned out, he really was more of an individualist claiming the National Socialist label by way of pandering to a group that he perceived to be his target audience. Many National Socialists similarly are confused. When forced to choose, they will come down on the side of personal liberty and individual freedom.

Fascism vs. Communism

Unlike many, I see fascism and communism as differing only in who nominally holds title to the assets of a nation. Communism actually is a bit more honest by claiming direct ownership, whereas fascism deals in the fiction of individual ownership, much like America today, all the while reserving the right to control anything and everything.

Think you own your house? Try not paying your property taxes and just see what happens.

I view political philosophies as lying on a circle: to the right are conservatives and to the left are liberals. Follow the conservatives far enough and you encounter fascism. Follow the liberals far enough and you encounter communism. Follow fascism and communism to their roots and you find yourself on the opposite side of the circle, at precisely the same place. You begin with individualism and personal freedom and end up with total collectivist lockdown, regardless of whether you follow the liberal or conservative path.

Collectivism = Control

Collectivism of every stripe has as its gravamen the control of a nation's citizenry. Increased organization leads to greater control. Organization is necessary for control. From control springs the personal benefit to a nation's rulers, of course.

Benevolent dictators are well and good, but always there comes the day when such leaders die, only to be replaced by not-so-benevolent dictators. Both tend to line their pockets as their ultimate power leads to their own ultimate corruption.

It does not take one long in a privileged position before one begins to perceive him or herself as different, somehow - as deserving that position and its perquisites more than others. That is the path to despotism and, ultimately, personal destruction for the self-deluded and privileged few.

Evil Incarnate: The Federal Reserve Bank and the Rothschilds

Hundreds of years ago, the Rothschild family set itself up in banking and from that decision sprang an empire, nay, empires aplenty, with the same people running things at every turn. The Federal Reserve System merely is today's manifestation of that control in America. It is called something different in other countries. Here is how these people work their scheme:

Cash gets siphoned continually as it works its way through any economic system, from consumer to producer and back down again. The siphoning is done via overcharging, fraud, profits, employee stock options, bonuses, taxes and theft. The fraud, overcharging and theft occur at all points in the system. Call it what you like: graft, juice, grease, etc.

Taxes are a peculiar form of theft, thus deserving of their own classification, since some of those taxes actually end up as benefits to the consumer, unlike the outright theft that occurs at all other places (including “profits,” which go into the pockets of a select few). That is why corporate taxes can be beneficial to society: they prevent the downstream theft that otherwise would occur and inure only to the benefit of a few.

Don’t blame me. That’s how the world works.

As the corruption becomes more apparent to the population being fleeced, calls for greater control ring out. Music to the ears of the collectivists in charge because such calls present the opportunity for even more control and, thus, even more profits.

Why Controlled Citizens Call for More Control

Oddly enough, there comes a point in national corruption when a little more control actually results in a fairer distribution of the bounty of that nation's economic system, as in America's health system today, which is grossly unfair to the multitudes of uninsured and underinsured middle-class Americans.

As things now stand, medicine in America should be completely socialized if we are not going to throw out the entire system and replace it with something just slightly this side of anarchy. Call it real-world economics, if you like, as I do not believe that this recognition of reality that goes well beyond the hard-knocks school of Austrian Economics actually has a name. Edgarnomics, if you will. Yes, you just heard me construct an argument for Obama's health-care plan, believe it or not.

Very few of us end up among the insiders who ultimately benefit from the corruption endemic to any economic or political system. We are on the outside, looking in and only occasionally scrabbling for crumbs that fall from the table. Everything goes to one of those thieves. Everything. There is no “marketplace,” as argued by Libertarians, because none of us truly are equals.

Now and again, some of us stumble upon a rich vein of plunder (e.g., a government contract, a Yale law degree, a Ponzi scheme, a corporate officership, political office, etc), thus becoming one of the insiders for a time.

Normally, though, what we subsist upon are mere crumbs plus whatever portion of the loot to which we lay claim in the form of wages, commissions, social security, highway usage or whatever.

The Myth of Differing Economic Systems

Capitalism as an economic system is a myth. Communism as an economic system is a myth. There are no different “economic systems.” There is only one system and it works as I have described, regardless of the political clothing in which one dresses it. Anarchy, too, merely is a political set of clothing for this system.

This is why Zionists such as the Rothschilds so effortlessly seem to switch from one political or economic philosophy to another and still prosper – they epitomize the ultimate game players and are genetically equipped to come out on top, time and again, because they ruthlessly and continually operate for their own self interest. Idealists like us are mere cattle to be farmed by them.

Only ruthless self-dealing can neutralize ruthless self-dealing, else one resembles the fool who brings a knife to a gun fight.

Austrian economics merely comes closer than Keynesianism to describing reality. Even so, it is woefully short of the mark.

Edgarnomics

Call it greed and self interest, perhaps. That is the only enduring reality. Edgarnomics. You heard it here first.

Graft and corruption trump all economic and social models, always have and almost always will, simply because they are the natural byproduct of civilization and organization.

A bright and shiny line can be drawn between the majority (us) and the corrupt “in crowd” (them) - the collectivists. Not a perfect overlay, but close enough to my perception of the two sides in all societies: the haves and the have-nots.

The haves have because they take from the have-nots in unfair measure. Always, the haves must be in the minority for this to provide for them in the manner they demand. Haves require organization in order to cut a slice from every transaction. The slice-taking in unfair measure represents the graft, corruption and untoward profit-taking to which I referred.

Anarchy as a System Overlay

Disorder, or anarchy, is anathema to the haves and to collectivism of every stripe.

As I said: to argue about differing economic models or alternate political systems is to engage in the wrong argument altogether. The real nub: individualism vs. collectivism. Without collectivism one cannot have true order and organization, from which one exacts an unfair and often-unseen advantage over others.

Anarchy is a vacuum, a lack of order, and collectivism is the pressure that relentlessly fills the vacuum. Humans yearn for order and organization and belonging and being told what to do and being free from having to make decisions. Humans yearn for the yoke, not individual freedom. This is like leaving the keys in the ignition and your car door unlocked in South-Central LA, because the collectivists are only too happy to oblige us by breaking the law, taking advantage of our naiveté and stealing the car.

Anarchy with Honor

Some argue for anarchy. They think they are true anarchists, but they are not. In reality, they argue for what I have dubbed "anarchy with honor." That honor is a set of rules that organizes anarchy, albeit in a minimal fashion. That minimal organization is the very minimum societal organization that I argue must be in place to hold the collectivists at bay. The American Constitution of 225 years ago accomplished that in grand fashion, but now has been displaced completely.

There comes a point in over-organizing that the only way to decrease the massive corruption is to organize even further, tightening down the screws – thus, my argument above for socialized medicine being more fair than what we have in America today. Yet, the real solution is found in scrapping everything and starting over - pressing the national or global Reset button.

Corruption traverses something of a bell-shaped curve versus societal freedom, which decreases linearly through time in all society forms. Theoretically, total lockdown squeezes out corruption. That is the misguided notion that Castro employed in implementing communism in Cuba. That was Orwell’s vision in 1984. Ultimately, however, total lockdown leads to total corruption and total slavery of the masses.

The real solution, of course, is to throw out the baby with the bathwater and reset the system to the start of that bell-shaped curve. That is why Jefferson proposed revolution on a regular basis.

Collectivists will not go without a fight. Yes, a civil war, dead babies in ditches and all, is inevitable, I believe.

New America - an idea whose time has come.

My name is Edgar J. Steele. Thanks for listening. Please visit my web site, www.NickelRant.com, for other messages just like this one.

-ed

Copyright ©2009, Edgar J. Steele

Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article
and its related audio file among private individuals and groups,
post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit
publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

On-Line link to this rant in HTML

Why I Call Minorities Names (Because they've EARNED it!)

Why I Call Minorities Names

Coons, niggers, porch monkeys, chimps, apes, oogaboogs, Sambos, boot heads, Rastus, Buckwheat, jigaboos, chimp humpers. Slopes, chinks, zips, zipper heads. Jews, kikes, hook noses, yids. Wetbacks, Mestizos, taco chompers, greasers, pepper guts. Rag heads, towel heads, sand niggers.
The list is almost endless. I, and all those like me use all these names and many more like them on a daily basis. Some people, especially liberals and those that have absorbed way too much liberal brainwashing over the years, are usually aghast at my comments, calling me crass, rude, bigoted, racist, and hateful. And as always they're missing the entire point. They always do. All these groups of so-called "minorities" have names for us whites that make those above seem mild. Mostly they use them in their native languages, which more and more often they're speaking right in front of us in our own country, even though they know it's rude, crude, disrespectful, and unethical to do so.
For example, one name the Mexicans use translates as "sub-humans", or "below us". Another group has one that translates to "the slave race". And still another has one that means "unclean ones". And this isn't counting all the names they have for us in English, or the ones they use to our faces. But interestingly, we never, ever hear anything about what they're saying about us, only what whites say about them. Just as everything else in this country has been redirected to attack whites only, this too, has become a casualty of political correctness and the liberal drive to disenfranchise the white race...
Believe me, these races insult us with a lot more venom and aggression than we could ever hope to muster, and they do it continually. And as long as they're free to do so, and free to murder, rob, rape, and mug my people, I will continue to do so. As long as they're in my country without my permission..or yours, I will continue. As long as they siphon dry our welfare system designed for whites only, I will continue. As long as they suck up billions in free housing, medical, and food stamps, I will continue. As long as our crooked leaders refuse to seal our borders and halt the invasion, I will continue. As long as liberals have control of our government and media, I will continue. And as long as my people refuse to get off their cowardly asses and do something about the evil destroying our nation and race, I shall continue to rant, rave, insult, name call, and generally be a royal pain in the ass to all our enemies, and all those too stupid to realize
I'm on their side. I want them offended. I want them to get mad and take notice. I want them to raise hell about it and start a dialogue on it. Because the more exposure their antics get, the better for us. Liberals and other parasites hate the truth. They like the shadows, the dark shroud of bullshit they hide behind. That's because the truth would force people to act. It would force these thieves and liars out. And that's exactly what I want. And the more of you that call these maggots names, the better. They honestly don't deserve better. Every one of them is a parasite or a predator, or both, making our once clean, safe, and proud nation just another dangerous third world toilet full of criminal muds from all corners of the globe, a trash can for the world's human refuse. They're all forcing themselves on us against our will, and they know it! So do our politicians, and they don't care! So I say to hell with them. If they don't like what I'm calling
them, they can GO HOME! If the blacks don't like it, they can LEAVE US ALONE! And if the politicians and liberals don't like it, they can hand back the reigns of power and go crawl back under the damp rock they slithered from.
Until we take back what's rightfully ours and mete out some long overdue justice, I'll continue to call a kike a kike and a nigger a nigger and a wetback a wetback! Fuck 'em all!.

nigger Obama Gives anti-2nd Amendment asshole new position of authority to abuse

Vote Coming to Confirm Anti-gun Radical
-- "Guns Kill Civil Society," says State Department Nominee

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, June 23, 2009


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has scheduled a Wednesday vote on a
State Department nominee who supports gun control on a global scale.

While advocates of the Second Amendment have come to expect that
appointees of President Barack Obama would be hostile to the rights of
gun owners, the president's nominee for legal advisor to the State
Department reaches a whole new level of anti-gun extremism.

Harold Hongju Koh, who served at the State Department under the Clinton
administration, is a self-described "trans-nationalist" who
believes
that our laws -- and our Constitution -- should be brought into
conformity with international agreements.

"If you want to be in the global environment, you have to play by the
global rules," Koh told a Cleveland audience.

Koh's positions treat our constitutional law as if it were a mere local
ordinance on the greater world stage. This is of particular concern to
gun owners at a time when the U.S. Congress is under pressure from
President Obama to ratify an international gun control treaty with
countries in the western hemisphere. That treaty, known by its Spanish
acronym CIFTA, would likely serve as a forerunner to a more extensive
United Nations initiative, the "Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and
Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in all its
Aspects."

The Bush administration, under the leadership of UN Ambassador John
Bolton, rejected the small arms treaty. Bolton plainly told the world
that the United States will not accept a gun control document that
violates our Constitutional right to bear arms. Harold Koh commented
that Bolton was being "needlessly provocative."

In a paper entitled "A world drowning in guns," Koh maintains
that a
civil society cannot exist with broad gun ownership: "Guns kill civil
society," he said.

Koh is eager to assume his post at the State Department, having lamented
that there is only so much that can be done from the outside to push gun
control treaties, and that ultimately we need people like him in
positions of power. The chief lawyer for the State Department is just
the position someone like him needs to put his agenda into play.

While Koh's nomination has been delayed largely because of Second
Amendment concerns, Sen. Reid plans to force a vote this week.

It is imperative that gun owners contact their Senators and insist that
they vote AGAINST this anti-gun extremist.

ACTION: Please contact your Senators immediately and urge them to
oppose Harold Hongju Koh's nomination to the State Department. You can
use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the pre-written
message below.


----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Senator:

The Senate is expected to soon vote on a State Department nominee who
supports gun control on a global scale.

Harold Hongju Koh, who served at the State Department under the Clinton
administration, is a self-described "trans-nationalist" who
believes
that our laws -- and our Constitution -- should be brought into
conformity with international agreements.

According to Koh, "If you want to be in the global environment, you have
to play by the global rules." Well, I don't support global rules that
contradict our own Constitution.

Koh supports international gun control treaties such as the United
Nations initiative entitles the "Program of Action to Prevent, Combat
and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in all
its Aspects."

When former UN Ambassador John Bolton told the world that the United
States will not accept a gun control document that violates our
Constitutional right to bear arms, Harold Koh commented that Bolton was
being "needlessly provocative."

And in a 2003 Fordham Law Review article entitled "A world drowning in
guns," Koh maintains that a civil society cannot exist with broad gun
ownership: "Guns kill civil society," he wrote.

I urge you to reject this trans-nationalist, anti-gun extremist who
would place foreign laws and international agreements on equal footing
(at minimum) with the U.S. Constitution.

Sincerely,

Cops Bust Kike Serial Cat Killer

They should let cats rip his tiny little jew balls to shreds, then tar-n-feather his ass, hang him from a lamp post, gut him and then set him on fire. But then again, I think we should do that to ALL the damn jews.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/15/AR2009061502807_pf.html

Two Miami Suburbs Breathe Easier as Police Nab Alleged Serial Cat Killer

MIAMI, June 15 -- An 18-year-old Florida man suspected in the mutilation of numerous cats over the last month -- shocking attacks that kept two suburban Miami communities on edge -- appeared in court here Monday to face charges of animal cruelty.

Tyler Weinman made only one comment via video link from the Miami-Dade County Pretrial Detention Center, greeting County Judge Mindy S. Glazer at the outset of his hearing. The boyish-faced Weinman was wearing a prison-issued suicide gown -- a one-piece garment designed to limit an inmate's ability to hurt himself.

Glazer found probable cause to hold Weinman over for trial on 19 counts of animal cruelty, four charges of burglary and 19 counts of improperly disposing of animal carcasses. She set bail at $249,500, but also required that he wear an electronic monitoring device and undergo a psychiatric evaluation before his release.

"I'm concerned about his safety and the safety of the community," Glazer said.

His attorney, David W. Macey, charged that Weinman had been interrogated for eight hours straight and kept awake for 24 hours following his arrest. "It's a sad day for the Constitution because Mr. Weinman is innocent," Macey said.

If convicted of all charges, Weinman could face a maximum sentence of 158 years in prison, State Attorney's Office spokeswoman Terry Chavez told the Associated Press.

Weinman was arrested Sunday morning, and law enforcement officials said he had been under surveillance for some time. A detective with the Miami-Dade County police said that authorities had received 60 tips regarding the case.

As many as 30 cat mutilations had been reported over the past month within a 50-block radius of two Miami suburbs, Cutler Bay and Palmetto Bay. In many of the cases, family pets had been snatched after dark, taken to an unknown location where they were mutilated, and then returned to their homes hours later, where the bodies were often discovered by horrified pet owners.

Some carcasses appear to have been posed or skinned. A number of victims described the injuries to their pets as "clean" wounds, inflicted by a sharp instrument.

The attacks galvanized civic leaders in Cutler Bay, with a population of about 40,000, and Palmetto Bay, with some 25,000 residents.

"This is about as typical a suburban neighborhood as it gets, a really tight community," Cutler Bay Mayor Paul S. Vrooman said.

Vrooman visited 13 homes of residents who lost pets, to assure them of the depth of police concern about the case, even though he suffers from an allergy to cats. "I just felt like that was the way to share what they've gone through," Vrooman said.

Palmetto Bay Mayor Eugene Flinn also met with residents and animal groups throughout the investigation. Before Sunday's arrest in the case, he hesitated to describe his own cat, Fiyero, to a reporter.

"How do I know you're not the cat killer," he asked.

Nancy Mayes, a Cutler Bay resident, was describing the horror of finding her murdered cat Sheba on a nearby policeman's lawn when she was interrupted by a voice over the television. "The so-called cat killer has struck again," the announcer said, telling of two fresh cat killings, and Mayes gasped as she pressed up against the television in the living room of her single-family home.

"My skin crawls when I think that this person has been in this neighborhood -- God knows how many times -- writing down addresses where they've seen cats," Mayes said.

the ADL and Their Promotion of Faggots and So-Called "Hate crimes"

EVANGELICAL SILENCE EMPOWERS ADL 'BULLYING'

By Harmony Grant and Rev. Ted Pike

In the California school district of Alameda, children as young as five will now be forced to learn pro-homosexual material—and parents will not be allowed to exempt them. The school district claims it is addressing "bullying" against students because of their "sexual orientation." Parents are outraged. Conservative groups are spreading the word. But few will speak against the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish supremacist organization responsible for creating and pressing for “hate crime” and “anti-bullying” laws as tools to silence Christian expression in America.

The mandatory indoctrination of children into tolerance of homosexuality comes from ADL and its partners. It’s clear that this is just one part of a much larger campaign against traditional morality in the echelons of governments, inspired by ADL, “the nation's premier civil rights/human relations agency.” Laws are enacted to insist that homosexuality be legitimized and normalized as a healthy alternative; the perspective that homosexuality is sinful, damaging, and unnatural is described as “hate”—no matter how many people believe such traditional morality or how many sacred books teach it.

Advocates of the pro-homosexual curriculum in California say the LGBT curriculum is "just a start" and a "first step" toward forcing homosexuality into the minds of young children, the Catholic News Agency reports. “Some reportedly told the board that no parental opt-out should be allowed because the children of curriculum opponents were those who most needed the instruction.” (Catholic News Agency)

This program is about re-education and social engineering—and no one knows those topics better than ADL.

ADL’s World of Difference program online speaks to parents and educators; Dr. Debra Byrnes is quoted: “…children begin developing attitudes about various groups in society as early as ages three or four. Initially such attitudes are quite flexible. However, as children grow older such attitudes become more difficult to change.” To an organization committed to changing American minds and undermining traditional viewpoints, incipient "homophobia" is clearly a problem. Kids need to be warned against such "bias" early.

We know ADL has this power; last month the National School Boards Association announced it’s partnering with ADL and supporting the League’s Making Diversity Count instruction for teachers. In 1997, ADL teamed with the National PTA to produce What to Tell Your Child about Prejudice and Discrimination. ADL has literally written the book on “anti-hate” instruction for teachers and students—producing tomes like Bias-Free Foundations: Early Childhood Guidebook and Activities for Educators. ADL has used Dr. Seuss and partnered with Sesame Street to create truly enticing material for small children. For this month’s recommended books, ADL’s World of Difference Institute features Gloria Goes to Gay Pride and The Harvey Milk Story (about the first openly gay elected city official).

ADL would like to start even younger than age five. Their website says “infants as young as eight months can detect differences in the people around them. By the time children are two; they have already been exposed to many social imprints. ADL's ground breaking early childhood programs are helping both preschool teachers and parents educate two- to four-year-olds so they may learn to accept diversity.” Remember, ADL is not primarily talking about different skin colors; the main thrust now is to accept the “diversity” of man-on-man anal sex, lesbianism, and other “social groupings.” According to ADL, this is what our children must learn to accept.

ADL says, “People tend to fear or distrust people who are not like themselves. When we convince ourselves that our way is the "right" way, we are more likely to strike out at those who are different.” This is, of course, most irritatingly incoherent. ADL is demanding that everyone suspect themselves of being wrong—except ADL! All beliefs should be turned upside down, except the belief that sexual morality has no boundaries and the family unit is infinitely malleable. ADL is teaching its own religion, its own intolerance. And we are now allowing it power as priest of the classroom, handing down its own religious arbitration on the most pressing moral issues of our time!

ADL director of early childhood education programs Linda Santora wrote an article, published in the winter 2006 National PTA magazine, about how to choose “anti-bias” books for kids. Santora said adults must carefully choose books that don’t reinforce social biases. “Unfortunately, not all children's literature conveys the messages we want young people to learn…For example, instead of choosing Cinderella, which perpetuates the stereotype of the lead female character as passive, dependent, and naive, adults could instead choose Robert Munsch's The Paper Bag Princess (Annick Press, 1980), in which the lead female character is portrayed as brave and independent.”

Cowards of Christendom

This spring, Americans for Legal Immigration (ALIPAC) issued a directive to all law enforcement agencies in America to beware of how ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) attempt to influence police against the religious and political right. SPLC and possibly ADL inspired the Missouri state police to issue a directive warning that Christians/conservatives pose a potential terrorist threat. Since the deplorable shooting at the Holocaust Museum last week, ADL has said more than anyone to infer that the political right is a seedbed of “haters" and potential terrorists who might erupt in violence.

ADL aggressively opposes the whole Christian/conservative movement - not just extremes of the far right. In 1988, it was discovered that ADL kept secret dossiers on over 10,000 unsuspecting Americans—including pro-lifers and mainstream evangelicals. ADL makes no secret of the fact that it records Christian and conservative broadcasts - in search of a possible "anti-Semitic" utterance.

Yet the largest evangelical leadership groups remain silent - as if ADL didn't exist. Even Orthodox rabbi Daniel Lapin publicly said that evangelicals and their values are "under relentless attack" by ADL; but the right remains in denial. (See, Rabbi Lapin: Christians Under 'Relentless Attack' by 'Secular Judaism')

Do Christian "watchdogs" have a moral right to such silence? The Bible says no. The Book of James says it is sin to prefer one person over another. Yet, "Israel-first" evangelicals do just that, exempting even the vilest Jewish corrupters from criticism, because they are "God's chosen people.”

In ancient Israel, the sons of the high priest Eli fornicated with women coming to sacrifice in the temple. Eli rebuked them vehemently, yet because he did not remove them from the priesthood God cursed his posterity for everlasting generations. (1 Sam. 2) Eli wanted to avoid trouble more than he loved God. Today, Christian leaders similarly fear ADL's epithet "anti-Semitic" more than they fear God’s wrath. God said that if any watchman does not warn of the enemy's approach, he will lose his soul (Ezekiel 33).

How evil is this unwarned-of enemy coming against us?

ADL and Jewish media are dragging Christian America and its young people through a moral sewer. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish) ADL now force-feeds homosexuality to children as young as five. It persuades state legislatures, municipalities, and school districts to adopt "anti-hate" ordinances and "anti-bullying" laws, specially protecting the vilest members of society - sodomites. Over the past two decades, ADL has spearheaded efforts to substitute same-sex marriage for the normal sexual relationship endorsed by God and nature. For 50 years, ADL has been the architect and prime mover behind all organized "anti-bias" pro-homosexual educational initiatives - within government, police, business, and public schools. ADL, as the worldwide PR representative of Israel, is attempting to overlay Christian society with a one-world spiritual, political, monetary, and commercial new world order centered in Jerusalem. ADL head Abe Foxman says he earnestly looks forward to the Jewish messiah (Anti-Christ) ruling over an enlightened world to come. (See, ADL's Foxman: Man of Faith?)

Despite all this, Christian and conservative leaders keep their pact of silence. At least Eli rebuked his sons. Our leaders can't even acknowledge ADL's existence – let alone rebuke its evil!

The Bible commands us to "reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long-suffering and doctrine." (2 Tim. 4:2) That means Christians and their leaders should rebuke ADL even if it means “long-suffering" under ADL's accusation of anti-Semitism. Instead, by their silence, such leaders shield those who wear the "sheep's clothing" of being God's chosen people but are ravening wolves, devouring and defiling everything that should be most sacred and protected - including America's families and youth.

Who has failed most grievously? Eli or evangelical leaders?

God will decide.